Bibliometric analysis of research activity in the “Agronomy” category from the Web of Science, 1997–2011

Abstract This bibliometric analysis aims to check the status and evolution of research activity from 1997 to 2011 within the fields of study of the category “Agronomy” of the Web of Science database. With a focus on articles and reviews, almost 88,000 publications were found (92.4% in English), of which 88% were carried out by research centers of the thirty countries with the highest production. For each article, quantitative and qualitative parameters (number of publications, international collaborations, authors, research centers, year impact factor, and number of citations per article) were analyzed, establishing rankings of countries and research centers. The study is complemented by an analysis of the evolution of the principal research topics through the study of keywords and with an analysis of the journals in the category. An increase in collaboration on all scales (authors, centers, and countries) indicates a greater globalization and structuration of the research carried out, with more complex and articulated research networks. The USA is the most important country in publication productivity with 22.5% of the total publications and thirty-five of the 100 most productive research centers. The spectacular growth in research carried out in emerging countries, such as Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, or India, challenges this leadership. In Europe, the levels of production have experienced a moderate increase, with high levels in indicators of impact and collaboration standing out.

[1]  Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo,et al.  Which Data Base Should we Use for our Literature Analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS , 2011 .

[2]  Xiaofeng Yang Stem cell transplantation for treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy , 2012, Neural regeneration research.

[3]  Loet Leydesdorff World shares of publications of the USA, EU-27, and China compared and predicted using the new web of science interface versus scopus , 2012 .

[4]  B. Lebwohl,et al.  Temporal and geographic trends in celiac disease publications: a bibliometric analysis , 2012, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[5]  J. I. Rojas-Sola,et al.  Análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones científicas mexicanas en la categoría engineering, chemical de la base de datos web of science (1997-2008) , 2010 .

[6]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  Assessing the knowledge base for biotechnology in South Africa , 2006, Scientometrics.

[7]  Yuh-Shan Ho,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of the performance of Water Research , 2010, Scientometrics.

[8]  E. Krauskopf Impacto de corto plazo de Chilean journal of agricultural research: Un análisis bibliométrico , 2012 .

[9]  S. M. Lawani Bibliometrics: Its Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Applications , 1981 .

[10]  José Ignacio Rojas-Sola,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of mexican scientific publications in the category engineering, chemical from the web of science data base (1997-2008) , 2010 .

[11]  Raúl Quevedo-Blasco,et al.  Análisis bibliométrico de las revistas multidisciplinares de psicología recientemente incorporadas en la Web of Science (2008-2009) , 2010 .

[12]  Gherardo Chirici Assessing the scientific productivity of Italian forest researchers using the Web of Science, SCOPUS and SCIMAGO databases , 2012 .

[13]  Yi Huang,et al.  Research status and trends in limnology journals: a bibliometric analysis based on SCI database , 2012, Scientometrics.

[14]  Peter Willett,et al.  A Bibliometric Study of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and QSAR & Combinatorial Science , 2009 .