Polarization-gated imaging in tissue phantoms: effect of size distribution.

We have investigated the effect of size distribution of aqueous solutions of monodisperse and a mixture of polydisperse scatterers of two different sizes on the image quality using linear and circularly polarized light. The contrast and resolution are affected by the size distribution present in the mixture of a polydisperse medium, while they are affected by the refractive index in a monodisperse medium. Circularly polarized light improves image quality of polydisperse scatterers. Images in the polydisperse medium are retrieved for values of optical thickness less than those of the large-sized monodisperse medium. We offer plausible explanations for all the experimental observations.

[1]  Asima Pradhan,et al.  Influence of size parameter and refractive index of the scatterer on polarization-gated optical imaging through turbid media. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  N. Ghosh,et al.  Depolarization of light in tissue phantoms - effect of a distribution in the size of scatterers. , 2003, Optics express.

[3]  Ralf Lenke,et al.  Depolarization of backscattered linearly polarized light. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  J S Tyo,et al.  Enhancement of the point-spread function for imaging in scattering media by use of polarization-difference imaging. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  S. Jacques,et al.  Imaging superficial tissues with polarized light , 2000, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[6]  Jessica C Ramella-Roman,et al.  Imaging skin pathology with polarized light. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  Chia-Wei Sun,et al.  Polarized light propagation through scattering media: time-resolved Monte Carlo simulations and experiments. , 2003, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  H. S. Patel,et al.  Depolarization of light in tissue phantoms – effect of collection geometry , 2003 .

[9]  Min Gu,et al.  Image enhancement through turbid media under a microscope by use of polarization gating methods , 1999 .

[10]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Use of polarized light to discriminate short-path photons in a multiply scattering medium. , 1992, Applied optics.

[11]  Asima Pradhan,et al.  Anomalous behavior of depolarization of light in a turbid medium , 2006 .

[12]  D. B. Rogozkin,et al.  Diffusion of circularly polarized light in a disordered medium with large-scale inhomogeneities , 1998 .

[13]  M. Moscoso,et al.  Influence of the relative refractive index on the depolarization of multiply scattered waves. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  S. Morgan,et al.  Effects of polarization state and scatterer concentration on optical imaging through scattering media. , 1997, Applied optics.

[15]  R R Alfano,et al.  Backscattering target detection in a turbid medium by use of circularly and linearly polarized light. , 2005, Optics letters.

[16]  J. Walsh,et al.  Polarization discrimination of coherently propagating light in turbid media. , 1999, Applied optics.

[17]  Asima Pradhan,et al.  Depolarization of light in a multiply scattering medium: effect of the refractive index of a scatterer. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  M Gu,et al.  Resolution improvement in microscopic imaging through turbid media based on differential polarization gating. , 1998, Applied optics.

[19]  Schmitt,et al.  Depolarization of multiply scattered waves by spherical diffusers: Influence of the size parameter. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[20]  H Radousky,et al.  Deep subsurface imaging in tissues using spectral and polarization filtering. , 2000, Optics express.

[21]  J. Walsh,et al.  Comparative study of polarized light propagation in biologic tissues. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.