A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies

A methodology for conducting the case study of a management information system (MIS) is presented. Suitable for the study of a single case, the methodology also satisfies the standard of the natural science model of scientific research.This article provides an overview of the methodological problems involved in the study of a single case, describes scientific method, presents an elucidation of how a previously published MIS case study captures the major features of scientific method, responds to the problems involved in the study of a single case, and summarizes what a scientific methodology for MIS case studies does, and does not, involve.The article also has ramifications that go beyond matters of MIS case studies alone. For MIS researchers, the article might prove interesting for addressing such fundamental issues as whether MIS research must be mathematical, statistical, or quantitative in order to be called "scientific". For MIS practitioners, the article's view of scientific method might prove interesting for empowering them to identify, for themselves, the pint at which scientific rigor is achieved in an MIS research effort, and beyond which further rigor can be called into question, especially if pursued at the expense of professional relevance.

[1]  Rob Kling,et al.  The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization , 1982, Adv. Comput..

[2]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[3]  Rob Kling,et al.  Automated welfare client-tracking and service integration: the political economy of computing , 1978, CACM.

[4]  Ma. de la Natividad Jiménez Salas,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry , 1967 .

[5]  R. Yin The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers , 1981 .

[6]  Leonard M. Fleck,et al.  Research Guide in Philosophy , 1977 .

[7]  M. Miles Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis , 1979 .

[8]  R. Yin The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy , 1981 .

[9]  Irving M. Copi,et al.  Introduction to Logic , 1962 .

[10]  A. M. Huberman,et al.  Fitting Words to Numbers , 1982 .

[11]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[12]  R. Bernstein The restructuring of social and political theory , 1978 .

[13]  F. Luthans,et al.  An Emic Perspective and Ethnoscience Methods for Organizational Research , 1984 .

[14]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[15]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Multisite/Multimethod Studies , 1982 .

[16]  Allen Lee,et al.  The Scientific Basis for Conducting Case Studies of Organizations. , 1985 .

[17]  Allen S. Lee Quixotic Communication , 1987 .

[18]  Richard J. Bernstein,et al.  Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1984 .

[19]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[20]  R. Ackoff The Future of Operational Research is Past , 1979 .

[21]  Charles Taylor,et al.  Interpretation and the sciences of man , 1973 .

[22]  T. R. Davis,et al.  An Idiographic Approach to Organizational Behavior Research: The Use of Single Case Experimental Designs and Direct Measures , 1982 .

[23]  T. Kuhn,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Reflections on my Critics , 1970 .

[24]  O. Holsti,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[25]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  A Mini-Cross-Site Analysis , 1982 .

[26]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[27]  P. R. Sanday The Ethnographic Paradigm(s). , 1979 .

[28]  R. Yin Studying Phenomenon and Context Across Sites , 1982 .

[29]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[30]  K. Popper,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .

[31]  K. Kraemer,et al.  Datawars: The Politics of Modeling in Federal Policymaking , 1987 .

[32]  R. Evered,et al.  Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: “Inquiry from the Inside” and “Inquiry from the Outside” , 1981 .

[33]  N. Meyers,et al.  H = W. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[35]  O. Behling The Case for the Natural Science Model For Research in Organizational Behavior And Organization Theory , 1980 .

[36]  Rob Kling,et al.  The control of information systems developments after implementation , 1984, CACM.

[37]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[38]  D. Campbell III. “Degrees of Freedom” and the Case Study , 1975 .

[39]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Learning the Craft of Organizational Research , 1983 .