Temporally selective processing of communication signals by auditory midbrain neurons.

Perception of the temporal structure of acoustic signals contributes critically to vocal signaling. In the aquatic clawed frog Xenopus laevis, calls differ primarily in the temporal parameter of click rate, which conveys sexual identity and reproductive state. We show here that an ensemble of auditory neurons in the laminar nucleus of the torus semicircularis (TS) of X. laevis specializes in encoding vocalization click rates. We recorded single TS units while pure tones, natural calls, and synthetic clicks were presented directly to the tympanum via a vibration-stimulation probe. Synthesized click rates ranged from 4 to 50 Hz, the rate at which the clicks begin to overlap. Frequency selectivity and temporal processing were characterized using response-intensity curves, temporal-discharge patterns, and autocorrelations of reduplicated responses to click trains. Characteristic frequencies ranged from 140 to 3,250 Hz, with minimum thresholds of -90 dB re 1 mm/s at 500 Hz and -76 dB at 1,100 Hz near the dominant frequency of female clicks. Unlike units in the auditory nerve and dorsal medullary nucleus, most toral units respond selectively to the behaviorally relevant temporal feature of the rate of clicks in calls. The majority of neurons (85%) were selective for click rates, and this selectivity remained unchanged over sound levels 10 to 20 dB above threshold. Selective neurons give phasic, tonic, or adapting responses to tone bursts and click trains. Some algorithms that could compute temporally selective receptive fields are described.

[1]  Gary J. Rose,et al.  Function of the Amphibian Central Auditory System , 2007 .

[2]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog , 1965 .

[3]  G. Rose,et al.  Auditory midbrain neurons that count , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Biophysics of underwater hearing in the clawed frog, Xenopus laevis , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  Jos J. Eggermont,et al.  Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. III. Stimulation with natural and synthetic mating calls , 1986, Hearing Research.

[6]  G. Pollack,et al.  Neural representation of sound amplitude by functionally different auditory receptors in crickets. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  O. Behrend,et al.  Neural responses to water surface waves in the midbrain of the aquatic predator Xenopus laevis laevis , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  G. Rose,et al.  Counting on Inhibition and Rate-Dependent Excitation in the Auditory System , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Tone and call responses of units in the auditory nerve and dorsal medullary nucleus of Xenopus laevis , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  J. H. Casseday,et al.  Neural tuning for sound duration: role of inhibitory mechanisms in the inferior colliculus. , 1994, Science.

[11]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  D. Kelley,et al.  Auditory and lateral line inputs to the midbrain of an aquatic anuran: Neuroanatomic studies in Xenopus laevis , 2001, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  M. Ryan,et al.  The Vocal Sac Increases Call Rate in the Túngara Frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 2006, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[14]  A S Feng,et al.  Differential innervation patterns of three divisions of frog auditory midbrain (torus semicircularis) , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Taffeta M. Elliott,et al.  Male discrimination of receptive and unreceptive female calls by temporal features , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  A S Feng,et al.  Temporal coding in the frog auditory midbrain: the influence of duration and rise-fall time on the processing of complex amplitude-modulated stimuli. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Capranica,et al.  Response patterns to tone bursts in peripheral auditory system of anurans. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  I. Straughan An Analysis of the Mechanisms of Mating Call Discrimination in the Frogs Hyla regilla and H. cadaverina , 1975 .

[19]  W. F. Blair Isolating Mechanisms and Interspecies Interactions in Anuran Amphibians , 1964, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[20]  A. Reyes,et al.  Synaptic mechanisms underlying auditory processing , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  D. H. Louage,et al.  Temporal properties of responses to broadband noise in the auditory nerve. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  D V Buonomano,et al.  Decoding Temporal Information: A Model Based on Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Marcel van der Heijden,et al.  Correlation Index: A new metric to quantify temporal coding , 2006, Hearing Research.

[24]  W. Smeets,et al.  Basal ganglia organization in amphibians: Afferent connections to the striatum and the nucleus accumbens , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Directional Hearing in Nonmammalian Tetrapods , 2005 .

[26]  D. Kelley,et al.  Vocal circuitry in Xenopus laevis: Telencephalon to laryngeal motor neurons , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  Gary J. Rose,et al.  Integration and recovery processes contribute to the temporal selectivity of neurons in the midbrain of the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[28]  D. Kelley,et al.  Vocal communication in Xenopus laevis , 1999 .

[29]  W. Hodos,et al.  Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation , 2005 .

[30]  M. Atzori,et al.  Differential synaptic processing separates stationary from transient inputs to the auditory cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Neural adaptations for processing the two-note call of the Puerto Rican treefrog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. , 1980, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[32]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[33]  A. Rees,et al.  Neuronal responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli in the guinea pig inferior colliculus, and their modification by broadband noise. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Communicative significance of the two-note call of the treefrogEleutherodactylus coqui , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[35]  C E Carr,et al.  Processing of temporal information in the brain. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[37]  Harald Luksch,et al.  The use of in vitro preparations of the isolated amphibian central nervous system in neuroanatomy and electrophysiology , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[38]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Discrimination of intermediate sounds in a synthetic call continuum by female green tree frogs. , 1978, Science.

[39]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  The Evolution of the amphibian auditory system , 1988 .

[40]  I. C. Whitfield,et al.  Chapter 5 – THE NEURAL CODE , 1978 .

[41]  D. Kelley Auditory and vocal nuclei in the frog brain concentrate sex hormones. , 1980, Science.

[42]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Mapping the auditory central nervous system ofXenopus laevis with 2-deoxyglucose autoradiography , 1982, Brain Research.

[43]  Albert S. Feng,et al.  Central Auditory Processing in Fish and Amphibians , 1999 .

[44]  Albert S. Feng,et al.  Neural analysis of temporally patterned sounds in the frog's thalamus: Processing of pulse duration and pulse repetition rate , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[45]  D. Kelley,et al.  Significance of temporal and spectral acoustic cues for sexual recognition in Xenopus laevis , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  M. J. Fouquette Speciation in Chorus Frogs. I. Reproductive Character Displacement in the Pseudacris Nigrita Complex , 1975 .

[47]  Taffeta M. Elliott,et al.  AMPHIBIAN UNDERWATER HEARING: BIOPHYSICS AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY , 2008 .

[48]  M. Littlejohn,et al.  Pulse Repetition Rate as the Basis for Mating Call Discrimination by Two Sympatric Species of Hyla , 1971 .

[49]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Neural representations of sinusoidal amplitude and frequency modulations in the primary auditory cortex of awake primates. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Albert S Feng,et al.  Influence of envelope rise time on neural responses in the auditory system of anurans , 1988, Hearing Research.

[51]  D. Kelley,et al.  Rapping, a female receptive call, initiates male-female duets in the South African clawed frog. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  P. Manis,et al.  Short-term synaptic depression and recovery at the mature mammalian endbulb of Held synapse in mice. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Can Spike Coordination Be Differentiated from Rate Covariation? , 2008, Neural Computation.

[54]  C. Barnard,et al.  Vocal communication between male Xenopus laevis , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  Albert S. Feng,et al.  Frequency selectivity in the anuran auditory midbrain: Single unit responses to single and multiple tone stimulation , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[56]  J. Doherty,et al.  Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog,Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.