City-Level IP Geolocation Algorithm Based on PoP Network Topology

The existing city-level IP geolocation algorithms determine the location of IP by delay measurement and landmark comparison, and thus, the geolocation ability of these algorithms is affected by the delay precision and the number of landmarks. To alleviate the dependence on these conditions, a new city-level geolocation algorithm is proposed based on the PoP network topology in this paper. First, according to the distribution of one-hop delay between network nodes in different cities, the network nodes belonging to the target city are picked out from the detection path, and the landmarks are extended. Second, common anonymous route structures are used to find and merge anonymous routes in the path information. Finally, the PoP network topology inside the city is extracted through the tightly connected network nodes, recorded into the PoP database, and used for city-level geolocation. The experiment results of 35 808 IP geolocations in 28 cities of China and the United States verify that the proposed algorithm still has good city-level geolocation ability when the delay accuracy is low or the number of landmarks is small, comparing with the existing typical IP geolocation algorithms LBG and SLG, the proposed algorithm improves the success rate of city-level geolocation from 74.86% and 94.14% to 97.67%.

[1]  Paul Barford,et al.  A Learning-Based Approach for IP Geolocation , 2010, PAM.

[2]  Aleksandar Kuzmanovic,et al.  Towards Street-Level Client-Independent IP Geolocation , 2011, NSDI.

[3]  Elena Simona Lohan,et al.  Robustness, Security and Privacy in Location-Based Services for Future IoT: A Survey , 2017, IEEE Access.

[4]  K. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Mining checkins from location-sharing services for client-independent IP geolocation , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  Helen J. Wang,et al.  Mining the Web and the Internet for Accurate IP Address Geolocations , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[6]  Brice Augustin,et al.  Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris traceroute , 2006, IMC '06.

[7]  Emin Gün Sirer,et al.  Octant: A Comprehensive Framework for the Geolocalization of Internet Hosts , 2007, NSDI.

[8]  Takahiro Hara,et al.  Dummy-Based User Location Anonymization Under Real-World Constraints , 2016, IEEE Access.

[9]  David Wetherall,et al.  Towards IP geolocation using delay and topology measurements , 2006, IMC '06.

[10]  Fan Zhao,et al.  A SC-Vivaldi Network Coordinate System based Method for IP Geolocation , 2016 .

[11]  Lei Li,et al.  Cognitive Approach for Location Privacy Protection , 2018, IEEE Access.

[12]  Fenlin Liu,et al.  An Algorithm of City-Level Landmark Mining Based on Internet Forum , 2015, 2015 18th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems.

[13]  Serge Fdida,et al.  Constraint-Based Geolocation of Internet Hosts , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[14]  Dan Li,et al.  IP-Geolocation Mapping for Moderately Connected Internet Regions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[15]  Jim Kurose,et al.  Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach , 1999 .

[16]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  A Structural Approach for PoP Geo-Location , 2010, 2010 INFOCOM IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops.

[17]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.