First objective evaluation of taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), a paradigm gustatory stimulus in humans

Practical and reliable methods for the objective measure of taste function are critically important for studying eating behavior and taste function impairment. Here, we present direct measures of human gustatory response to a prototypical bitter compound, 6-n-propyltiouracil (PROP), obtained by electrophysiological recordings from the tongue of subjects who were classified for taster status and genotyped for the specific receptor gene (TAS2R38), and in which taste papilla density was determined. PROP stimulation evoked negative slow potentials that represent the summated depolarization of taste cells. Depolarization amplitude and rate were correlated with papilla density and perceived bitterness, and associated with taster status and TAS2R38. Our study provides a robust and generalizable research tool for the quantitative measure of peripheral taste function, which can greatly help to resolve controversial outcomes on the PROP phenotype role in taste perception and food preferences, and be potentially useful for evaluating nutritional status and health.

[1]  P. F. Moortele,et al.  Human taste cortical areas studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging: evidence of functional lateralization related to handedness , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  B. Tepper,et al.  Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. , 2008, Annual review of nutrition.

[3]  R. Pangborn,et al.  COMPARISON OF TIME‐INTENSITY WITH CATEGORY SCALING OF BITTERNESS OF ISO‐α‐ACIDS IN MODEL SYSTEMS AND IN BEER* , 1983 .

[4]  G. Holder.  Pattern Electroretinography (PERG) and an Integrated Approach to Visual Pathway Diagnosis , 2001, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[5]  B. Tepper,et al.  Greater energy intake from a buffet meal in lean, young women is associated with the 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) non-taster phenotype , 2011, Appetite.

[6]  R. Crnjar,et al.  The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), is associated with fungiform papilla density, whereas PROP bitterness is mostly due to TAS2R38 in an ethnically-mixed population , 2015, Physiology & Behavior.

[7]  B. Tepper,et al.  Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans. , 2010, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  Z. Kutalik,et al.  Sensitivity of Genome-Wide-Association Signals to Phenotyping Strategy: The PROP-TAS2R38 Taste Association as a Benchmark , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  B. Tepper,et al.  Understanding creaminess perception of dairy products using free-choice profiling and genetic responsivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. , 2003, Chemical senses.

[10]  S. Cabras,et al.  The Gustin (CA6) Gene Polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), as a Mechanistic Link between PROP Tasting and Fungiform Taste Papilla Density and Maintenance , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  B. Tepper,et al.  PROP Taster Status Is Related to Fat Perception and Preference a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  B. Green,et al.  Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties , 1993 .

[13]  R. Crnjar,et al.  Marked Increase in PROP Taste Responsiveness Following Oral Supplementation with Selected Salivary Proteins or Their Related Free Amino Acids , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  TAS2R38 (phenylthiocarbamide) haplotypes, coronary heart disease traits, and eating behavior in the British Women's Heart and Health Study. , 2005, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[15]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Author contributions , 2021 .

[16]  D. G. Laing,et al.  Rapid quantitative assessment of fungiform papillae density in the human tongue , 2005, Brain Research.

[17]  T Kobayakawa,et al.  Functional MRI detection of activation in the primary gustatory cortices in humans. , 2005, Chemical senses.

[18]  J. Weiffenbach,et al.  Association Between 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Bitterness and Colonic Neoplasms , 2005, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[19]  E. Gibney,et al.  Bitter Taste Perception and Dietary Intake Patterns in Irish Children , 2013, Lifestyle Genomics.

[20]  S. V. Lipchock,et al.  Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[21]  Ann C. Noble,et al.  Physiological factors contributing to the variability of sensory assessments: Relationship between salivary flow rate and temporal perception of gustatory stimuli☆ , 1994 .

[22]  U. Vogel,et al.  Genetic variation in the hTAS2R38 taste receptor and brassica vegetable intake , 2011, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[23]  Patrizia Muroni,et al.  Associations between Orosensory Perception of Oleic Acid, the Common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (rs1761667 and rs1527483) in the CD36 Gene, and 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Tasting , 2015, Nutrients.

[24]  P. Contu,et al.  Polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and the taste bud trophic factor, gustin gene co-operate in modulating PROP taste phenotype , 2011, Physiology & Behavior.

[25]  S. Coldwell,et al.  Validation of edible taste strips for assessing PROP taste perception. , 2013, Chemical senses.

[26]  D. Reed,et al.  The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception. , 2001, Annals of human biology.

[27]  P. Scott-Johnson,et al.  The electroolfactogram: A review of its history and uses , 2002, Microscopy research and technique.

[28]  Kristin Scott.  Taste Recognition: Food for Thought , 2005, Neuron.

[29]  B. Tepper,et al.  Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children , 2002, Appetite.

[30]  L. Marks,et al.  Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[31]  Francis McGlone,et al.  Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[32]  L. Bartoshuk.  The biological basis of food perception and acceptance , 1993 .

[33]  B. Tepper,et al.  Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-n-propylthoiuracil bitter-taste phenotype. , 2006, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[34]  P. Gasparini,et al.  Variation in the Bitter‐taste Receptor Gene TAS2R38, and Adiposity in a Genetically Isolated Population in Southern Italy , 2008, Obesity.

[35]  T. Lehtimäki,et al.  Genetic variation in the hTAS2R38 taste receptor and food consumption among Finnish adults , 2014, Genes & Nutrition.

[36]  A. L. Fox.  The Relationship between Chemical Constitution and Taste. , 1932, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  G. Heck,et al.  Human salt taste and the lingual surface potential correlate. , 2009, Chemical senses.

[38]  F. Rousset.  genepop’007: a complete re‐implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux , 2008, Molecular ecology resources.

[39]  J. Hayes,et al.  Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake , 2006, Physiology & Behavior.

[40]  M. Kloor,et al.  Association Between TAS2R38 Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study in Two Independent Populations of Caucasian Origin , 2011, PloS one.

[41]  Claudia Caltagirone,et al.  Dose-Dependent Effects of L-Arginine on PROP Bitterness Intensity and Latency and Characteristics of the Chemical Interaction between PROP and L-Arginine , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil has no influence on dietary patterns, body mass indexes, or plasma lipid profiles of women. , 2007, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[43]  J. Slack,et al.  The Molecular Basis of Individual Differences in Phenylthiocarbamide and Propylthiouracil Bitterness Perception , 2005, Current Biology.

[44]  P. Roach,et al.  TAS2R38 bitter taste genetics, dietary vitamin C, and both natural and synthetic dietary folic acid predict folate status, a key micronutrient in the pathoaetiology of adenomatous polyps. , 2011, Food & function.

[45]  John Prescott,et al.  Human hedonic responses to sweetness: Role of taste genetics and anatomy , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[46]  Beverly J. Tepper,et al.  Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[47]  Gary J. Pickering,et al.  Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[48]  B. Tepper,et al.  A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[49]  J. Guinard,et al.  Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women , 2002, Appetite.

[50]  R. Mattes,et al.  Genetic variation in bitter taste and plasma markers of anti-oxidant status in college women , 2009, International journal of food sciences and nutrition.

[51]  Mark Leppert,et al.  Positional Cloning of the Human Quantitative Trait Locus Underlying Taste Sensitivity to Phenylthiocarbamide , 2003, Science.

[52]  A. Flock,et al.  Hydrops in the cochlea can be induced by sound as well as by static pressure , 2000, Hearing Research.

[53]  Linda M. Bartoshuk,et al.  PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[54]  Beverly J. Tepper,et al.  Genetic Sensitivity to the Bitter Taste of 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) and Its Association with Physiological Mechanisms Controlling Body Mass Index (BMI) , 2014, Nutrients.

[55]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Young women's food preferences and taste responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) , 2000, Physiology & Behavior.

[56]  Z. Bujas,et al.  Individual gustatory reaction times to various groups of chemicals that provoke basic taste qualities , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Stephen D. Roper,et al.  The cell biology of taste , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[58]  J. Hayes,et al.  Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation. , 2007, Chemical senses.

[59]  A. Stunkard,et al.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. , 1985, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[60]  Michael J Bamshad,et al.  Natural selection and molecular evolution in PTC, a bitter-taste receptor gene. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[61]  J. Desimone,et al.  Salt-evoked lingual surface potential in humans. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  E. Glanville,et al.  Taste Perception and the Menstrual Cycle , 1965, Nature.

[63]  Judith R Kidd,et al.  Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. , 2008, Chemical senses.