Traditional versus improved designs for cycloidal speed reducers with a small tooth difference: The effect on dynamics

Abstract Whereas traditional cycloid reducers tend to have a one tooth difference design, a two teeth difference design is common when the transmission ratio is low (≦ 17). The dynamic characteristics of these small teeth difference designs, however, remain unclear. Hence, this study constructs an analytic model of system dynamics in a cycloid reducer with a small tooth difference. Specifically, taking a transmission ratio of 17 as an example, it analyzes both free-pin and fixed-pin designs to show the shortcomings of traditional designs. It then proposes a nonpin design that improves on these shortcomings, one in which the pinwheel is replaced by a cycloid internal gear. Next, adopting the theory of gearing, it constructs a mathematical model of the nonpin design with a multitooth difference and derives undercutting equations to check for the persistence of undercutting on the tooth profile. It also determines the parameter design range of nonundercutting. In an analysis of system dynamics, it then investigates twelve nonpin cases with a small tooth difference, showing the effect of the design parameters on the reducer's system dynamics. The results indicate that appropriate design parameters can indeed improve on the shortcomings of the traditional design.

[1]  Avinash Singh,et al.  Influence of Ring Gear Rim Thickness on Planetary Gear Set Behavior , 2010 .

[2]  Hong-Sen Yan,et al.  Geometry design of an elementary planetary gear train with cylindrical tooth-profiles , 2002 .

[3]  Daniel C. H. Yang,et al.  Design and application guidelines for cycloid drives with machining tolerances , 1990 .

[4]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Unified Approach to Cycloid Drive Profile, Stress, and Efficiency Optimization , 2010 .

[5]  D. C. H. Yang,et al.  Cycloid Drives With Machining Tolerances , 1989 .

[6]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  A New Cycloid Drive With High-Load Capacity and High Efficiency , 2004 .

[7]  Bingkui Chen,et al.  Generation and investigation of a new cycloid drive with double contact , 2012 .

[8]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Efficiency of High-Sensitivity Gear Trains, Such as Cycloid Drives , 2013 .

[9]  Faydor L. Litvin,et al.  Computerized design and generation of cycloidal gearings , 1996 .

[10]  Chiu-Fan Hsieh,et al.  The effect on dynamics of using a new transmission design for eccentric speed reducers , 2014 .

[11]  Chiu-Fan Hsieh,et al.  Geometric Design Using Hypotrochoid and Nonundercutting Conditions for an Internal Cycloidal Gear , 2007 .

[12]  Chiu-Fan Hsieh,et al.  Dynamics Analysis of Cycloidal Speed Reducers With Pinwheel and Nonpinwheel Designs , 2014 .

[13]  Changlin Wu,et al.  Mathematical modeling of the transmission performance of 2K–H pin cycloid planetary mechanism , 2007 .

[14]  Gordon R. Pennock,et al.  Geometry for trochoidal-type machines with conjugate envelopes , 1994 .

[15]  Joong-Ho Shin,et al.  On the lobe profile design in a cycloid reducer using instant velocity center , 2006 .

[16]  Carlo Gorla,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of a Cycloidal Speed Reducer , 2008 .

[17]  Blaza Stojanovic,et al.  A New Design of a Two-Stage Cycloidal Speed Reducer , 2011 .

[18]  F. Litvin,et al.  Gear geometry and applied theory , 1994 .

[19]  Paolo Pennacchi,et al.  Non Undercutting Conditions in Internal Gears , 2000 .

[20]  Chiu-Fan Hsieh,et al.  Determination of surface singularities of a cycloidal gear drive with inner meshing , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[21]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Cycloid vs. harmonic drives for use in high ratio, single stage robotic transmissions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  M. A Parameswaran,et al.  Analysis of a cycloid speed reducer , 1983 .

[23]  Sasa Cukovic,et al.  Modeling of the Meshing of Trochoidal Profiles With Clearances , 2012 .