Two successive neurocognitive processes captured by near-infrared spectroscopy: Prefrontal activation during a computerized plus-shaped maze task

The present study using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) examined prefrontal activation associated with maze-solving performance in adult humans. The participants were required to solve a plus-shaped maze, comparable to the one used for pigeons and human children to behaviorally assess planning processes, by moving a target square to a goal square presented on a touch-sensitive screen. The participants made incorrect responses toward a previous goal immediately after the goal jumped to the end of another arm, in parallel with but less frequently than previous participants, with shorter reaction times than when they correctly adjusted their responses. In these incorrect trials, relatively larger hemodynamic changes having two peaks were observed, especially in channels near the right inferior frontal cortex (IFC), suggesting use of additional cognitive resources for adjustment of responses after making errors. In addition to showing human adults' better behavioral inhibition than previous participants, the present NIRS data suggest a difference in prefrontal activation patterns according to whether inhibition of the forward plan was working well or not. The results also testify to the effective NIRS recording, while the participants were moving a computer-generated stimulus by actually making finger touches to the monitor.

[1]  T. Robbins,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions. , 1998 .

[2]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Anomalous neural circuit function in schizophrenia during a virtual Morris water task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Moffat Aging and Spatial Navigation: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? , 2009, Neuropsychology Review.

[4]  M. Rieger,et al.  Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with Parkinson’s disease , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[5]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibitory control in rats performing a stop-signal reaction-time task: effects of lesions of the medial striatum and d-amphetamine. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  D. Biro,et al.  NUMERICAL ORDERING IN A CHIMPANZEE (PAN TROGLODYTES) : PLANNING, EXECUTING, AND MONITORING , 1999 .

[7]  S Dehaene,et al.  A hierarchical neuronal network for planning behavior. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Kazuo Fujita,et al.  Route selection by pigeons (Columba livia) in "traveling salesperson" navigation tasks presented on an LCD screen. , 2010, Journal of comparative psychology.

[9]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Strategic navigation of two-dimensional alley mazes: comparing capuchin monkeys and chimpanzees , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[10]  S. Resnick,et al.  Age differences in the neural systems supporting human allocentric spatial navigation , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[11]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Virtual spatial registration of stand-alone fNIRS data to MNI space , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Nicholas J. Mulcahy,et al.  Apes Save Tools for Future Use , 2006, Science.

[13]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[14]  J. Tanji,et al.  Activity in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Reflects Multiple Steps of Future Events in Action Plans , 2006, Neuron.

[15]  R. Dolan,et al.  Neural systems engaged by planning: a PET study of the Tower of London task , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  I. Adachi,et al.  Performance of pigeons (Columba livia) on maze problems presented on the LCD screen: in search for preplanning ability in an avian species. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[17]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Age Differences in the Frontal Lateralization of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory Revealed by PET , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  A M Owen,et al.  Specific cognitive deficits in tests sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in obsessive–compulsive disorder , 1996, Psychological Medicine.

[20]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Frontostriatal system in planning complexity: a parametric functional magnetic resonance version of tower of london task , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  Bernd Philippen,et al.  When response inhibition is followed by response reengagement: An event‐related fMRI study , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[22]  J. Fuster Prefrontal Cortex , 2018 .

[23]  T. Robbins,et al.  Frontal-striatal cognitive deficits in patients with chronic schizophrenia. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  T. Shallice Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  宮田 裕光,et al.  Prefrontal activation during and before solution of an eight-arm shuriken-shaped maze task presented on a touch screen: a near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2010 .

[26]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Planning for the future by western scrub-jays , 2007, Nature.

[27]  A. Owen Cognitive planning in humans: Neuropsychological, neuroanatomical and neuropharmacological perspectives , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[28]  Kazuo Fujita,et al.  How do keas (Nestor notabilis) solve artificial-fruit problems with multiple locks? , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[29]  S. Itakura,et al.  Planning in human children (Homo sapiens) assessed by maze problems on the touch screen. , 2009, Journal of comparative psychology.

[30]  J. Barton,et al.  Age differences in the formation and use of cognitive maps , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  A. Dagher,et al.  Mapping the network for planning: a correlational PET activation study with the Tower of London task. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  E. Watanabe,et al.  Spatial and temporal analysis of human motor activity using noninvasive NIR topography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[34]  N. Emery,et al.  Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays , 2001, Nature.

[35]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Western Scrub-Jays Anticipate Future Needs Independently of Their Current Motivational State , 2007, Current Biology.

[36]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory , 1992 .

[37]  G. Dawson,et al.  Age-related neural activity during allocentric spatial memory , 2009, Memory.

[38]  M. Corballis,et al.  Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. , 1997, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[39]  Archana K. Singh,et al.  Exploring the false discovery rate in multichannel NIRS , 2006, NeuroImage.

[40]  S. Stone-Elander,et al.  Brain Activation Induced by the Perceptual Maze Test: A PET Study of Cognitive Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[41]  Kazuo Fujita,et al.  Pigeons (Columba livia) plan future moves on computerized maze tasks , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[42]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Cognition: Numerical memory span in a chimpanzee , 2000, Nature.

[43]  T. Robbins Dissociating executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[44]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Development of interception of moving targets by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in an automated task , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[45]  J. Tanji,et al.  Categorization of behavioural sequences in the prefrontal cortex , 2007, Nature.