Hydrodynamic function of biomimetic shark skin: effect of denticle pattern and spacing

The structure of shark skin has been the subject of numerous studies and recently biomimetic shark skin has been fabricated with rigid denticles (scales) on a flexible substrate. This artificial skin can bend and generate thrust when attached to a mechanical controller. The ability to control the manufacture of biomimetic shark skin facilitates manipulation of surface parameters and understanding the effects of changing denticle patterns on locomotion. In this paper we investigate the effect of changing the spacing and arrangement of denticles on the surface of biomimetic shark skin on both static and dynamic locomotor performance. We designed 3D-printed flexible membranes with different denticle patterns and spacings: (1) staggered-overlapped, (2) linear-overlapped, and (3) linear-non-overlapped, and compared these to a 3D-printed smooth-surfaced control. These 3D printed shark skin models were then tested in a flow tank with a mechanical flapping device that allowed us to either hold the models in a stationary position or move them dynamically. We swam the membranes at a frequency of 1 Hz with different heave amplitudes (from ±1 cm to ±3 cm) while measuring forces, torques, self-propelled swimming speed, and cost of transport (COT). Static tests revealed drag reduction of denticle patterns compared to a smooth control at low speeds, but increased drag at speeds above 25 cm s(-1). However, during dynamic (swimming) tests, the staggered-overlapped pattern produced the fastest swimming speeds with no significant increase in the COT at lower heave values. For instance, at a heave frequency of 1 Hz and amplitude of ±1 cm, swimming speed of the staggered-overlapped pattern increased by 25.2% over the smooth control. At higher heave amplitudes, significantly faster self-propelled swimming speeds were achieved by the staggered-overlapped pattern, but with higher COT. Only the staggered-overlapped pattern provides a significant swimming performance advantage over the smooth control and the other two denticle patterns. Quantitative hydrodynamic comparisons among skin models where control over manufacture allows alteration of design parameters provides a useful experimental tool for future work on the considerable natural diversity of shark skin denticles both among species and on different body locations.

[1]  George V Lauder,et al.  Undulatory locomotion of flexible foils as biomimetic models for understanding fish propulsion , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  G. Lauder,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics and wake structure of the pectoral fins during locomotion in leopard sharks Triakis semifasciata. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  W. Reif,et al.  Hydrodynamics of the squamation in fast swimming sharks , 1982 .

[4]  G. Lauder,et al.  Passive robotic models of propulsion by the bodies and caudal fins of fish. , 2012, Integrative and comparative biology.

[5]  Frank E. Fish,et al.  The role of the pectoral fins in body trim of sharks , 2000 .

[6]  J. H. Long,et al.  Turning maneuvers in sharks: Predicting body curvature from axial morphology , 2009, Journal of morphology.

[7]  Li Wen,et al.  Understanding undulatory locomotion in fishes using an inertia-compensated flapping foil robotic device , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[8]  G. Lauder,et al.  Functional morphology of the pectoral fins in bamboo sharks, Chiloscyllium plagiosum: Benthic vs. Pelagic station‐holding , 2001, Journal of morphology.

[9]  George V Lauder,et al.  The hydrodynamic function of shark skin and two biomimetic applications , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  D. W. Bechert,et al.  Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  G. Lauder,et al.  Function of the heterocercal tail in sharks: quantitative wake dynamics during steady horizontal swimming and vertical maneuvering. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  W. Meyer,et al.  Basics of skin structure and function in elasmobranchs: a review. , 2012, Journal of fish biology.

[13]  W. McGillis,et al.  The boundary layer of swimming fish. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  R. Shadwick How Tunas and Lamnid Sharks Swim: An Evolutionary Convergence These fishes diverged millions of years ago, but selection pressures have brought them very similar biomechanical schemes for movement , 2005 .

[15]  A. Smits,et al.  Scaling the propulsive performance of heaving flexible panels , 2013, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  P. Motta,et al.  Scale morphology and flexibility in the shortfin mako Isurus oxyrinchus and the blacktip shark Carcharhinus limbatus , 2012, Journal of morphology.

[17]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Biomimetics inspired surfaces for drag reduction and oleophobicity/philicity , 2011, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[18]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  SWIMMING KINEMATICS OF SHARKS , 1982 .

[19]  M. E. Demont,et al.  Scallop Shells Exhibit Optimization of Riblet Dimensions for Drag Reduction. , 1997, The Biological bulletin.

[20]  Minjie Wang,et al.  Vacuum casting replication of micro-riblets on shark skin for drag-reducing applications , 2012 .

[21]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  G. Lauder,et al.  Dynamics of freely swimming flexible foils , 2011 .

[23]  J. M. Blanco,et al.  Biological characterization of the skin of shortfin mako shark Isurus oxyrinchus and preliminary study of the hydrodynamic behaviour through computational fluid dynamics. , 2015, Journal of fish biology.

[24]  Iman Borazjani,et al.  The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  G. Lauder,et al.  Swimming Mechanics and Energetics of Elasmobranch Fishes , 2015 .

[26]  Amy Lang,et al.  Shark Skin Separation Control Mechanisms , 2011 .

[27]  James Tangorra,et al.  Fish biorobotics: kinematics and hydrodynamics of self-propulsion , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  Uwe Schulz,et al.  Shark skin inspired riblet structures as aerodynamically optimized high temperature coatings for blades of aeroengines , 2011 .

[29]  G. Lauder,et al.  Biomimetic shark skin: design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[30]  P. Motta,et al.  Movable shark scales act as a passive dynamic micro-roughness to control flow separation , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[31]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Passive mechanical models of fish caudal fins: effects of shape and stiffness on self-propulsion , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[32]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Robotic Models for Studying Undulatory Locomotion in Fishes , 2011 .