The outpatient bleeding risk index: validation of a tool for predicting bleeding rates in patients treated for deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND Long-term anticoagulation prevents recurrent thrombosis in patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, but with a risk of clinically important so-called major bleeding. Physician- and patient-based decisions on the optimal duration of therapy are sensitive to the bleeding risk. The Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index potentially provides a means of calculating the potential risk of bleeding using easily elicited clinical findings, but, to our knowledge, the authors of the index have provided the only published validation of it. We sought to determine the accuracy of the index in our population of patients. METHODS We prospectively applied the Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index to consecutive patients in our clinic who had been objectively diagnosed as having pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis and who were about to undergo standard therapy. Standard therapy consisted of a minimum of 5 days of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy overlapped with warfarin sodium therapy, and continuation of warfarin therapy for at least 3 months, with a target international normalized ratio of 2.5. Patients were placed in 3 risk groups (low, moderate, or high), as defined by the index. The survival curves of the groups, using major hemorrhages as the events, were then compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS Bleeding rates were lower than expected, but the index did discriminate between low- and moderate-risk groups (P =.03, log-rank test). The rate of major hemorrhage per 100 person-years was 0% (95% confidence interval, 0%-2.8%) in the low-risk group and 4.3% (95% confidence interval, 1.1%-11.1%) in the moderate-risk group. The rate in the high-risk group could not be defined because only 2 patients were at high risk. CONCLUSION The Outpatient Bleeding Risk Index discriminates between low- and moderate-risk patients, and could be used to guide decisions on the optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy.

[1]  M. Forgie Duration of oral anticoagulation in first-episode idiopathic deep vein thrombosis: A Markov decision analysis. , 2001 .

[2]  R. Beyth,et al.  A Multicomponent Intervention To Prevent Major Bleeding Complications in Older Patients Receiving Warfarin , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  M. Prins,et al.  Duration of Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism and a Deficiency of Antithrombin, Protein C or Protein S - A Decision Analysis , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[4]  M Gent,et al.  A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Beyth,et al.  Prospective evaluation of an index for predicting the risk of major bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin. , 1998, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Assessment of a Bleeding Risk Index in Two Cohorts of Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants , 1996, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[7]  R. Beyth,et al.  Anticoagulant-related bleeding: clinical epidemiology, prediction, and prevention. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Sixma,et al.  Identification of risk factors for bleeding during treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with heparin or low molecular weight heparin. , 1991, Blood.

[9]  C. Landefeld,et al.  A bleeding risk index for estimating the probability of major bleeding in hospitalized patients starting anticoagulant therapy. , 1990, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  L Goldman,et al.  Bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: relation to the prothrombin time and important remediable lesions. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.