Spinal Motion Segments — II: Tuning and Optimisation for Biofidelic Performance

Most commercially available spine analogues are not intended for biomechanical testing, and the few that are suitable for using in conjunction with implants and devices to allow a hands-on practice on operative procedures are very expensive and still none of these offers patient-specific analogues that can be accessed within reasonable time and price range. Man-made spine analogues would also avoid the ethical restrictions surrounding the use of biological specimens and complications arising from their inherent biological variability. Here we sought to improve the biofidelity and accuracy of a patient-specific motion segment analogue that we presented recently. These models were made by acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) in 3D printing of porcine spine segments (T12−L5) from microCT scan data, and were tested in axial loading at 0.6 mm·min −1 (strain rate range 6×10 −4 s −1 –10×10 −4 s −1 ). In this paper we have sought to improve the biofidelity of these analogue models by concentrating in improving the two most critical aspects of the mechanical behaviour: the material used for the intervertebral disc and the influence of the facet joints. The deformations were followed by use of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and consequently different scanning resolutions and data acquisition techniques were also explored and compared to determine their effect. We found that the selection of an appropriate intervertebral disc simulant (PT Flex 85) achieved a realistic force/displacement response and also that the facet joints play a key role in achieving a biofidelic behaviour for the entire motion segment. We have therefore overall confirmed the feasibility of producing, by rapid and inexpensive 3D-printing methods, high-quality patient-specific spine analogue models suitable for biomechanical testing and practice.

[1]  Robert A. Draughn,et al.  Factors Affecting Mechanical Properties of Bone , 1999 .

[2]  Andrew R. Millard,et al.  The taphonomy of cooked bone: characterizing boiling and its physico–chemical effects , 2002 .

[3]  J. Leasure,et al.  Biomechanical Validation of a Synthetic Lumbar Spine , 2014 .

[4]  Eduardo Alberto Fancello,et al.  Error Analysis of the Digital Image Correlation Method , 2010 .

[5]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[6]  Clayton J. Adam,et al.  Biomechanics of the human intervertebral disc: A review of testing techniques and results. , 2017, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[7]  Huimin Xie,et al.  Mean intensity gradient: An effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation , 2010 .

[8]  J. Costi,et al.  The effect of hydration on the stiffness of intervertebral discs in an ovine model. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  Thomas Becker,et al.  Error Estimations in Digital Image Correlation Technique , 2007 .

[10]  Peter Ifju,et al.  Experimental characterization of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS and polycarbonate parts , 2017 .

[11]  A W Miles,et al.  Anatomical measurements of porcine lumbar vertebrae. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  J E Smeathers,et al.  Dynamic compressive properties of human lumbar intervertebral joints: a comparison between fresh and thawed specimens. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  John P Domann,et al.  Development and Validation of an Analogue Lumbar Spine Model and its Integral Components , 2011 .

[14]  Gianluca Tozzi,et al.  The use of digital image correlation in the biomechanical area: a review , 2016 .

[15]  F. N. Reece,et al.  Effect of Preconditioning on Bone Breaking Strength , 1980 .

[16]  C Franceskides,et al.  Subject-specific functional model of hard and soft tissues; skull and spine , 2018 .

[17]  William C Welch,et al.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Ping Hu,et al.  Isotropic and anisotropic elasticity and yielding of 3D printed material , 2016 .

[19]  G. P. Pal,et al.  Transmission of weight through the lower thoracic and lumbar regions of the vertebral column in man. , 1987, Journal of anatomy.

[20]  L E Claes,et al.  Formalin fixation strongly influences biomechanical properties of the spine. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Alok Sutradhar,et al.  Experimental validation of 3D printed patient-specific implants using digital image correlation and finite element analysis , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[22]  Miguel Marco,et al.  Full-field strain distribution in multi-vertebra spine segments: An in vitro application of digital image correlation. , 2017, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  Jean-José Orteu,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Accuracy in the Ultimate Error Regime: Main Results of a Collaborative Benchmark , 2013 .

[24]  Gianluca Tozzi,et al.  Spinal Motion Segments — I: Concept for a Subject-specific Analogue Model , 2020 .

[25]  Sven Bossuyt,et al.  Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation , 2006 .

[26]  T. Smit The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine – biomechanical considerations , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[27]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  In Vitro Biomechanical Characteristics of the Spine: A Comparison Between Human and Porcine Spinal Segments , 2010, Spine.

[28]  Sabina Gheduzzi,et al.  The dynamic, six-axis stiffness matrix testing of porcine spinal specimens. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.