Does The Motivation for Foreign Direct Investment Affect Productivity Spillovers to the Domestic Sector

There is increasing empirical and theoretical evidence that foreign direct investment (FDI) may be motivated not by the desire to exploit some competitive advantage possessed by multinationals, but to access the technology of host economy firms. Using a panel of FDI flows across OECD countries and manufacturing sectors between 1984 and 1995, we test whether these contrasting motivations influence the effects that FDI has on domestic total factor productivity. The distinction between technology-exploiting FDI (TEFDI) and technology-sourcing FDI (TSFDI) is made using R&D intensity differentials between host and source sectors. The hypothesis that the motivation for FDI has an effect on total factor productivity spillovers is supported: TEFDI has a net positive effect, while TSFDI has a net negative effect. These net effects are explained in terms of the offsetting influences of productivity spillovers and market stealing effects induced by incoming multinationals.

[1]  J. Love,et al.  The ownership advantage in Latin American FDI: A sectoral study of us direct investment in Mexico , 1999 .

[2]  Walter Kuemmerle,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment in Industrial Research in the Pharmaceutical and Electronics Industries: Results from a Survey of Multinational Firms , 1999 .

[3]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[4]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela , 1999 .

[5]  Kitack Lee,et al.  Growth and Convergence in a Multicountry Empirical Stochastic Solow Model , 1997 .

[6]  N. Crespo,et al.  Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers – What Do We Really Know? , 2007 .

[7]  Jorge Niosi,et al.  The internationalization of industrial R&D : From technology transfer to the learning organization , 1999 .

[8]  H. Görg,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment, Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from Quantile Regressions , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Multinationals without Advantages , 1999 .

[10]  K. Taylor,et al.  Productivity and labour demand effects of inward and outward FDI on UK industry , 2008 .

[11]  B. Kogut,et al.  Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States , 1991 .

[12]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach—A Comment , 1998 .

[13]  R. Barrell,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment, Technological Change, and Economic Growth within Europe , 1997 .

[14]  D. Neven,et al.  Technology Sourcing and FDI in the EC: An Empirical Evaluation , 1995 .

[15]  S. Girma.  Absorptive Capacity and Productivity Spillovers from FDI: A Threshold Regression Analysis , 2005 .

[16]  N. Oulton.  Increasing Returns and Externalities in UK Manufacturing: Myth or Reality? , 1996 .

[17]  J. Dunning.  Explaining International Production , 1988 .

[18]  A. Kokko,et al.  Multinational Corporations and Spillovers , 1998 .

[19]  Nagesh Kumar.  Intangible assets, internalisation and foreign production: Direct investments and licensing in Indian manufacturing , 1987 .

[20]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Causes of Direct Investment: Foreign Firms' Shares in Canadian and United Kingdom Manufacturing Industries , 1974 .

[21]  D. Chudnovsky,et al.  DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMÍA DOCUMENTO DE TRABAJO “Foreign direct investment spillovers and the absorption capabilities of domestic firms in the Argentine manufacturing sector (1992-2001)” , 2004 .

[22]  Manuel G. Serapio,et al.  Globalization of industrial R&D: an examination of foreign direct investments in R&D in the United States , 1999 .

[23]  Ricardo J. Caballero,et al.  Internal versus external economies in European industry , 1990 .

[24]  E. Strobl,et al.  Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta‐Analysis , 2001 .

[25]  M. Casson,et al.  The future of the multinational enterprise , 1977 .

[26]  N. Driffield.  The Impact on Domestic Productivity of Inward Investment in the UK , 2001 .

[27]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[28]  Nazrul Islam,et al.  Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach , 1995 .

[29]  Mona Haddad,et al.  Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment?: Evidence from panel data for Morocco , 1993 .

[30]  W. Kuemmerle.  The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[31]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth: A Reexamination , 1984 .

[32]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[33]  Ricardo J. Caballero,et al.  External effects in U.S. procyclical productivity , 1992 .

[34]  A. Safarian,et al.  Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and R&D Spillovers , 1999 .

[35]  Ignatius J. Horstmann,et al.  Exploring New Markets: Direct Investment, Contractual Relations and the Multinational Enterprise , 1995 .

[36]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Are Apparent Productive Spillovers a Figment of Specification Error? , 1994 .

[37]  D. Weil,et al.  A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth Author ( s ) : , 2008 .