Bimanual 1:1 with 90° continuous relative phase: difficult or easy!

The purpose of the present experiment was to observe the performance of participants attempting to produce a 1:1 bimanual coordination pattern with 90° relative phase between the arms when feedback concerning the movement of the two limbs was integrated within a Lissajous plot and when this information was withdrawn. One group was paced with an auditory metronome and the other was encouraged to increase frequency when they fell below the goal frequency. We predicted that providing a salient integrated feedback display without a metronome would allow participants to effectively tune-in the goal relative phase pattern within several minutes; instead of several days as typically found in the literature when the metronome was used. The data indicated remarkably effective performances after 5 min of practice when the metronome was not used, with motion of both limbs harmonic in nature, and continuous relative phase errors (~10°) and standard deviation of continuous relative phase (~10°) relatively small. This seems remarkable given that this coordination pattern has proven relatively difficult to perform under normal and Lissajous feedback conditions even after several days of practice. As predicted relative phase errors and variability increased substantially when the metronome was used. When the extrinsic feedback was withdrawn all participants tended to drift from the required 90° relative phase, but the cycle duration variability in the two limbs remained stable and limb motion remained harmonic in nature. The current findings suggest that some of the difficulty typically associated with producing various relative phase patterns is due to the less than optimal perceptual information available in the various testing situations and the use of pacing metronomes.

[1]  J A Kelso,et al.  Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. , 1988, Science.

[2]  Stephan P Swinnen,et al.  AGE-RELATED DEFICITS IN MOTOR LEARNING AND DIFFERENCES IN FEEDBACK PROCESSING DURING THE PRODUCTION OF A BIMANUAL COORDINATION PATTERN. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[3]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Moving Farther but Faster , 2006, Psychological science.

[4]  G P Bingham,et al.  Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Dominic Simon,et al.  Perceptual and motor contributions to bimanual coordination , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination , 2001, Nature.

[7]  Y. Guiard On Fitts's and Hooke's laws: simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  A Perceptually Driven Dynamical Model of Bimanual Rhythmic Movement (and Phase Perception) , 2004 .

[9]  J. Kelso,et al.  Posturally induced transitions in rhythmic multijoint limb movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Hermann Haken,et al.  Neural and Synergetic Computers , 1988 .

[11]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Spatial Conceptual Influences on the Coordination of Bimanual Actions: When a Dual Task Becomes a Single Task , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  R. Ivry,et al.  Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions , 1997 .

[14]  Paolo Cavallari,et al.  Preferential coupling between voluntary movements of ipsilateral limbs , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. A. S. Kelso,et al.  Order in Time: How the Cooperation Between the Hands Informs the Design of the Brain , 1988 .

[17]  G P Bingham,et al.  Visual perception of the relative phasing of human limb movements , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  S. P. Swinnen,et al.  Relative Phase Alterations During Bimanual Skill Acquisition. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  T D Lee,et al.  Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns. , 1997, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[20]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  David R. Collins,et al.  Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination: stable perception leads to stable action , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Natalia Dounskaia,et al.  Preferred and induced coordination modes during the acquisition of bimanual movements with a 2 :1 frequency ratio , 1997 .

[23]  Sarah R Hurley,et al.  The influence of augmented feedback and prior learning on the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination pattern. , 2006, Human movement science.

[24]  J. Summers,et al.  The acquisition of bimanual coordination is mediated by anisotropic coupling between the hands. , 2002, Human movement science.

[25]  P G Zanone,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  A. J. Kovacs,et al.  Perceptual influences on Fitts’ law , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.