Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model*

This study identifies variables that explain variations in computer use. Factor analysis of data gathered from 422 business administration faculty reveal eight themes among the independent variables. Seven of these factors significantly discriminate among non, minimal, and high users. These results suggest an empirical model for future studies and provide policy insights for decision makers seeking to stimulate computer usage. Additionally, the study shows that there is much commonality between the previously separate organizational innovation and information systems implementation streams. It also demonstrates that motivation theory may be a valid framework within which to study computer use.

[1]  F. Damanpour,et al.  Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of "organizational lag." , 1984 .

[2]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[3]  M. Patrickson Adaptation by employees to new technology , 1986 .

[4]  N. Carter Computerization as a Predominate Technology: Its Influence on the Structure of Newspaper Organizations , 1984 .

[5]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure. , 1971 .

[6]  G. Huber Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing? , 1983 .

[7]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  INFORMATION CHANNEL DISPOSITION AND USE , 1987 .

[8]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[9]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process , 1981, MIS Q..

[10]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[11]  Fariborz Damanpour,et al.  The Adoption of Technological, Administrative, and Ancillary Innovations: Impact of Organizational Factors , 1987 .

[12]  R. Zmud INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[13]  E. Fennema,et al.  Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments Designed to Measure Attitudes Toward the Learning of Mathematics by Females and Males. , 1976 .

[14]  J. Gentry,et al.  Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers , 1983 .

[15]  J. Utterback The Process of Technological Innovation Within the Firm , 1971 .

[16]  Blake Ives,et al.  Information system technology can improve customer service , 1986, DATB.

[17]  F. Blackler,et al.  Evaluation and the Impact of Information Technologies on People in Organizations , 1985 .

[18]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[19]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Information Systems Concepts for Management , 1982 .

[20]  D. Lichtman,et al.  Survey of Educator's Attitudes toward Computers. , 1979 .

[21]  R. Walton Social Choice in the Development of Advanced Information Technology , 1982 .

[22]  R. Zmud An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[23]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  The dimensions of accessibility to online information: implications for implementing office information systems , 1984, TOIS.

[24]  Blake Ives,et al.  The information system as a competitive weapon , 1984, CACM.

[25]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The use of an interactive information storage and retrieval system in medical research , 1978, CACM.

[26]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[27]  Perry R. Morrison A survey of attitudes toward computers , 1983, CACM.

[28]  M. Becker,et al.  Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model , 1970 .

[29]  Robert S. Lee SOCIAL ATTITUDES AND THE COMPUTER REVOLUTION , 1970 .

[30]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation , 1977 .

[31]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? , 1986, CACM.

[32]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[33]  Nancy K. Napier,et al.  Train Right or Don't Train at All. , 1985 .

[34]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Human Information Processing in Information and Decisoin Support Systems , 1982, MIS Q..