A Modified Generative Adversarial Nets Integrated With Stochastic Approach for Realizing Super-Resolution Reservoir Simulation

Simulations and seismic inversions exhibit good performance in reservoir modeling task for the steady performance of conventional techniques. However, they still hardly meet the high demand of petroleum exploration since the impossibility of reaching high resolution both in vertical and lateral directions. Furthermore, simulations can only provide high-resolution results near loggings, while seismic inversions usually contain band-limited problems. Therefore, we present the modified generative adversarial nets with a decoder (DeGAN) as a novel approach, which is integrated with sequential simulation to realize super-resolution reservoir simulation. Specifically, the proposed method provides a geological model with high vertical resolution and optimized by the Zeoppritz function, introducing logging and seismic data simultaneously. After resampling and warping, DeGAN can be trained by these data sets and supplies a structure to generate high-frequency parts for reconstructing a super-resolution simulation of a subsurface profile. The proposed method presents the three-flow architecture of DeGAN to balance the contributions of three neural network models and utilizes this strategy in an offshore area successfully. By introducing multiple data sets, density experiments demonstrate that this approach can provide density profile with super-resolution for revealing possible thin layers, and the frequency distribution is in accord with loggings. The positive result verifies the effectiveness of this approach for providing a super-resolution simulation to supply a solution to the problem of the band-limited profile in seismic inversion.

[1]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Image inpainting , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[2]  J. Whitten,et al.  Gaussian Lobe Function Expansions of Hartree—Fock Solutions for the First‐Row Atoms and Ethylene , 1966 .

[3]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Stochastic Reservoir Modeling Using Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm , 1995 .

[4]  James Irving,et al.  Regional–scale integration of multiresolution hydrological and geophysical data using a two-step Bayesian sequential simulation approach , 2013 .

[5]  D. Douglas,et al.  Variations in the Arctic's multiyear sea ice cover: A neural network analysis of SMMR‐SSM/I data, 1979–2004 , 2005 .

[6]  Ole Winther,et al.  Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric , 2015, ICML.

[7]  Production Data Integration in Sand/Shale Reservoirs Using Sequential Self-Calibration and GeoMorphing: A Comparison , 2000 .

[8]  N. Simonov,et al.  Analysis of the Super‐Resolution Effect on Microwave Tomography , 2018, Radio Science.

[9]  R. Webster,et al.  Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Zefeng Li,et al.  Machine Learning Seismic Wave Discrimination: Application to Earthquake Early Warning , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[11]  S. Yuan,et al.  Stochastic spectral inversion for sparse-spike reflectivity by presetting the number of non-zero spikes as a prior sparsity constraint , 2014 .

[12]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[13]  Jun Li,et al.  Unsupervised Feature Extraction in Hyperspectral Images Based on Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Seiji Miyoshi,et al.  Bayesian image super-resolution of large image with a compound MRF and estimating registration parameters , 2012 .

[15]  O. Castelnau,et al.  Complex force history of a calving‐generated glacial earthquake derived from broadband seismic inversion , 2016 .

[16]  Lin Zhu,et al.  Generative Adversarial Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Xian-Huan Wen,et al.  Production Data Integration in Sand/Shale Reservoirs Using Sequential Self-Calibration and GeoMorphing: AComparison , 2002 .

[18]  Jon F. Claerbout,et al.  Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing: With Applications to Petroleum Prospecting , 1985 .

[19]  N. Hargreaves,et al.  Inverse Q filtering by Fourier transform , 1991 .

[20]  Sinopec Shengli,et al.  Generalized linear AVO inversion with the priori constraint of trivariate cauchy distribution based on Zoeppritz equation , 2013 .

[21]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Deep-learning-based seismic data interpolation: A preliminary result , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[22]  Guo-Fa Li,et al.  Experimental analysis and application of sparsity constrained deconvolution , 2013, Applied Geophysics.

[23]  Jing Xu,et al.  A Deep Learning Algorithm of Neural Network for the Parameterization of Typhoon‐Ocean Feedback in Typhoon Forecast Models , 2018 .

[24]  M. Chouteau,et al.  3D stochastic inversion of gravity data using cokriging and cosimulation , 2010 .

[25]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Transforming Autoencoders , 2011 .

[26]  L. Hu Gradual Deformation and Iterative Calibration of Gaussian-Related Stochastic Models , 2000 .

[27]  Richard M. Shane,et al.  RIVERWARE: A GENERALIZED TOOL FOR COMPLEX RESERVOIR SYSTEM MODELING 1 , 2001 .

[28]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Image quilting for texture synthesis and transfer , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[29]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.

[30]  Qiang Guo,et al.  Prestack Seismic Inversion Based on Anisotropic Markov Random Field , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  H. Haldorsen,et al.  Stochastic Modeling (includes associated papers 21255 and 21299 ) , 1990 .

[32]  R. T. Shuey,et al.  A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations , 1985 .

[33]  Philippe Doyen,et al.  ebook - Seismic Reservoir Characterization: An Earth Modelling Perspective (EET 2) , 2007 .

[34]  Yanghua Wang,et al.  A stable and efficient approach of inverse Q filtering , 2002 .

[35]  Ethem Alpaydin,et al.  Introduction to machine learning , 2004, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[36]  Soumith Chintala,et al.  Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks , 2015, ICLR.

[37]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Transforming Auto-Encoders , 2011, ICANN.

[38]  Daniel Cohen-Or,et al.  Fragment-based image completion , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[39]  Darren J. Wilkinson,et al.  Bayesian sequential inference for nonlinear multivariate diffusions , 2006, Stat. Comput..

[40]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image Super-Resolution Via Sparse Representation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[41]  Simon Osindero,et al.  Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, ArXiv.

[42]  V. V. Geppener,et al.  Design of speaker verification systems with the use of an algorithm of Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) , 2007, Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis.

[43]  Michael Elad,et al.  Fast and robust multiframe super resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  Léon Bottou,et al.  Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks , 2017, ICML.

[45]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Network , 2015, ArXiv.