Virtual worlds: multi-disciplinary research opportunities

Virtual worlds are now a reality, representing intriguing environments for researchers from multiple fields to pursue collaborative investigations. To provide a background, we first highlight the basic business and sociological phenomena occurring in virtual worlds. Real world institutions, ranging from business to governmental organizations, are already experiencing the effects of increased growth in the number of individuals participating in these virtual world environments. We consider research paths from four representative perspectives: (1) information systems, (2) neurobiology, (3) political science, and (4) organizational governance research. Virtual world environments offer significant opportunities for research in many fields for study, including demonstration and examination of intra-world and inter-world practice and behavior.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[2]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[3]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[4]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[5]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[6]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[7]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Direction of action is represented in the ventral premotor cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  P Ekins,et al.  The Drama of the Commons - Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S. & Weber, E. (Eds.), National Academy Press, Washington DC (Review) , 2004 .

[9]  John Orbell,et al.  A “Cognitive Miser” Theory of Cooperators Advantage , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[10]  John Orbell,et al.  Organizing Groups for Collective Action , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Stephanie S. Barrett,et al.  Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[12]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[13]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[15]  L. Packard,et al.  My second life. , 2002, WORLD.

[16]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Visual and action cues contribute to the self–other distinction , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Ikenberry,et al.  Global Trends 2015: A Dialogue about the Future with Nongovernment Experts , 2001 .

[18]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[20]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[21]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Drama of the Commons , 2002 .

[22]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[23]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[24]  John Henry Clippinger,et al.  The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise , 2000 .

[25]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .