An analysis of solute diffusion in rocks

The diffusion of unreactive solutes through a fine-grained rock (Culebra Dolomite) was studied experimentally and theoretically. The measured diffusive flux is less than half that predicted from independent knowledge of the porosity and reasonable estimates of tortuosity. This low measured flux led to a review of the relationship between solute diffusion and pore geometry in rocks and sediments. We therefore examined solute transport in hypothetical pore networks where the effect of pore geometry on the solute flux is directly calculable. A conventional interpretation of pore tortuosity, as a normalized length of diffusion through a pore, must be expanded for cases where pores intersect in networks. Some important variables affecting the tortuosity are: (i) the distribution of pore sizes, (ii) the distribution of pore lengths, (iii) the number of pores which intersect at a node, and (iv) the pore shape between nodes. Furthermore, in porous materials with a preferential distribution of pore sizes and orientation, tortuosity is a tensor. For the Culebra Dolomite, the wide range of pore sizes causes the diffusive flux to vary considerably from that predicted from conventional theory. Solute diffusion through the Culebra Dolomite greatly resembles diffusion through an isotropic network of pores, once this network is assigned pore sizes similar to the rock.

[1]  J. Bear.  Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[2]  B. B. Owen,et al.  The Physical Chemistry of Electrolytic Solutions , 1963 .

[3]  P. M. Heertjes,et al.  Analysis of diffusion in macroporous media in terms of a porosity, a tortuosity and a constrictivity factor , 1974 .

[4]  T. Madden,et al.  The effect of pressure on the electrical resistivity of water‐saturated crystalline rocks , 1965 .

[5]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  Effective diffusion in bi-disperse media—an effective medium approach , 1984 .

[6]  S. Lowell.  Introduction to powder surface area , 1979 .

[7]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[8]  John Emery Adams,et al.  Upper Permian Ochoa Series of Delaware Basin, West Texas and Southeastern New Mexico , 1944 .

[9]  Eugene E. Petersen,et al.  Diffusion in a pore of varying cross section , 1958 .

[10]  D. G. Shipley.  Two phase flow in large diameter pipes , 1984 .

[11]  R. Jenkins,et al.  Calculation of the transient diffusion of a gas through a solid membrane into a finite outflow volume , 1970 .

[12]  M. Bradbury,et al.  The effect of dead-end porosity on rock-matrix diffusion , 1985 .

[13]  D. Norton,et al.  Transport phenomena in hydrothermal systems: the nature of porosity , 1977 .

[14]  R. A. Ellis,et al.  Determining diffusion coefficients in marine sediments; a laboratory study of the validity of resistivity techniques , 1979 .

[15]  R. Aller,et al.  Diffusion coefficients in nearshore marine sediments1 , 1982 .

[16]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  Diffusion in the rock matrix: An important factor in radionuclide retardation? , 1980 .

[17]  A. Michaels.  Diffusion in a pore of irregular cross section—a simplified treatment , 1959 .

[18]  Vasilis N. Burganos,et al.  Diffusion in pore networks: Effective medium theory and smooth field approximation , 1987 .

[19]  D. Miller,et al.  Estimation of tracer diffusion coefficients of ions in aqueous solution , 1982 .

[20]  S. Kirkpatrick.  Percolation and Conduction , 1973 .

[21]  J. Koplik,et al.  Conductivity and permeability from microgeometry , 1984 .

[22]  L. Devell.  MEASUREMENTS OF THE SELF-DIFFUSION OF WATER IN PURE WATER, H$sub 2$O-D$sub 2$O MIXTURES AND SOLUTIONS OF ELECTROLYTES , 1962 .

[23]  W. Casey,et al.  Modeling solute transport and sulfate reduction in marsh sediments , 1987 .

[24]  Alan H. Muhr,et al.  Diffusion in gels , 1982 .

[25]  Robert A. Berner,et al.  Early Diagenesis: A Theoretical Approach , 1980 .