Changes in Involved and Uninvolved Limb Function During Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Functional testing is used to assess anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction rehabilitation, with the goal of symmetric ability. The pattern of change in the uninvolved limb’s function during rehabilitation is not established. Hypotheses: (1) Involved and uninvolved limb ability increases during rehabilitation, but the uninvolved limb ability increases to a lesser degree. (2) Hop tests will show larger initial asymmetry and will improve the most with rehabilitation. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 122 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction at our ambulatory surgery center and received multiple postoperative Standard Functional Tests (SFTs) between October 2009 and October 2013. Ten of the 12 individual tests within the SFT battery were analyzed. The patients’ earliest and latest SFTs were compared for changes in Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) and absolute function in each limb. We also analyzed the subgroup with SFTs (n = 38) at both 4 and 6 months postoperatively. Results: In all patients with multiple SFTs, involved limb performance increased in all tests except eyes-closed stork. Uninvolved limb performance increased in 4 SFT component tests and decreased in none. LSI significantly improved in 6 tests, all of which also showed involved limb improvement that was significant. Of these 6 tests, 5 showed initial LSI below 90%: single-leg squat, retro step-up, single-leg hop, crossover triple hop, and timed hop. Retro step-up and single-leg hop showed LSI improvements greater than 10 percentage points. In patients with 4- and 6-month data, involved limb performance increased in all tests except single-leg triple hop. Uninvolved limb performance increased in 5 SFT component tests and decreased in none. LSI significantly improved in 4 tests, all of which had initial LSI below 90%, and showed involved limb improvement that was significant. Retro step-up, single-leg hop, and crossover triple hop showed LSI improvements greater than 10 percentage points. Conclusion: During ACL reconstruction rehabilitation, LSI improvements indicated absolute increases in involved limb ability and were not attributable to uninvolved limb deterioration. The single-leg squat, retro step-up, single-leg hop, crossover triple hop, and timed hop are suggested as highly useful tests, since all showed initial LSI below 90%, with significant LSI improvement after rehabilitation.

[1]  P. Fowler,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of the One-Leg Hop Test Following ACL Reconstruction , 1992 .

[2]  L. Hiemstra,et al.  Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  Glenn N. Williams,et al.  A Systematic Review of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation – Part I: Continuous Passive Motion, Early Weight Bearing, Postoperative Bracing, and Home-Based Rehabilitation , 2008, The journal of knee surgery.

[4]  C. Kaeding,et al.  Hop tests correlate with IKDC and KOOS at minimum of 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  D. Hopper,et al.  Test–retest reliability of knee rating scales and functional hop tests one year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2002 .

[6]  A. Anderson,et al.  The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  S M Lephart,et al.  Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability. , 2001, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[8]  Lynn Snyder-Mackler,et al.  Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. , 2012, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[9]  Joanna Kvist,et al.  Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury , 2004, Sports medicine.

[10]  J. Richmond,et al.  Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  T. Hewett,et al.  Incidence of Contralateral and Ipsilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury After Primary ACL Reconstruction and Return to Sport , 2012, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[12]  S M Lephart,et al.  Relationship between Selected Physical Characteristics and Functional Capacity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Insufficient Athlete. , 1992, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[13]  F R Noyes,et al.  Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  R. Wright,et al.  Bracing after ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  W. Dunn,et al.  Return to High School– and College-Level Football After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  R Petschnig,et al.  The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength test and hop tests for distance and one-legged vertical jump test following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[17]  P. Stratford,et al.  Hop Testing Provides a Reliable and Valid Outcome Measure During Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[18]  N. Adachi,et al.  A prospective study of 3-day versus 2-week immobilization period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2007, The Knee.

[19]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  Single-Legged Hop Tests as Predictors of Self-Reported Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  A. Ekeland,et al.  Prospective study of changes in impairments and disabilities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 1999, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[21]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[22]  R. Marder,et al.  Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: a comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  Kevin R Ford,et al.  Utilization of modified NFL combine testing to identify functional deficits in athletes following ACL reconstruction. , 2011, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[24]  Sophia Nimphius,et al.  DETERMINATION OF FUNCTIONAL STRENGTH IMBALANCE OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES , 2006, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[25]  P. Kannus,et al.  Simple Measurements in Assessing Muscle Performance After an ACL Reconstruction , 2002, International journal of sports medicine.

[26]  Y Blache,et al.  Asymmetries in joint work during multi‐joint movement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A pilot study , 2014, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[27]  T. Hewett,et al.  Biomechanical Measures during Landing and Postural Stability Predict Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Return to Sport , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[28]  F. Noyes,et al.  Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[29]  M. Salavati,et al.  Comparison of functional outcome measures after ACL reconstruction in competitive soccer players: a randomized trial. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  Michael D Ross,et al.  Test‐Retest Reliability of 4 Single‐Leg Horizontal Hop Tests , 2002, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[31]  O. Taser,et al.  The mid- to long-term results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons using Transfix technique , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[32]  R. Cingel,et al.  Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[33]  K E Wilk,et al.  The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[34]  K. Webster,et al.  Return to the Preinjury Level of Competitive Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[35]  T. Hewett,et al.  Limb Asymmetries in Landing and Jumping 2 Years Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[36]  E. Roos,et al.  Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.