Design and Evaluation of the Terminal Area Precision Scheduling and Spacing System

This paper describes the design, development and results from a high fidelity human-in-the-loop simulation of an integrated set of trajectory-based automation tools providing precision scheduling, sequencing and controller merging and spacing functions. These integrated functions are combined into a system called the Terminal Area Precision Scheduling and Spacing (TAPSS) system. It is a strategic and tactical planning tool that provides Traffic Management Coordinators, En Route and Terminal Radar Approach Control air traffic controllers the ability to efficiently optimize the arrival capacity of a demand-impacted airport while simultaneously enabling fuel-efficient descent procedures. The TAPSS system consists of four-dimensional trajectory prediction, arrival runway balancing, aircraft separation constraint-based scheduling, traffic flow visualization and trajectory-based advisories to assist controllers in efficient metering, sequencing and spacing. The TAPSS system was evaluated and compared to today's ATC operation through extensive series of human- in-the loop simulations for arrival flows into the Los Angeles International Airport. The test conditions included the variation of aircraft demand from a baseline of today's capacity constrained periods through 5%, 10% and 20% increases. Performance data were collected for engineering and human factor analysis and compared with similar operations both with and without the TAPSS system. The engineering data indicate operations with the TAPSS show up to a 10% increase in airport throughput during capacity constrained periods while maintaining fuel-efficient aircraft descent profiles from cruise to landing.

[1]  R. A. Slattery,et al.  En-route descent trajectory synthesis for air traffic control automation , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[2]  Eric Hoffman,et al.  MERGING ARRIVAL FLOWS WITHOUT HEADING INSTRUCTIONS , 2007 .

[3]  John-Paul Clarke,et al.  Separation Analysis Methodology for Designing Area Navigation Arrival Procedures , 2007 .

[4]  J W Andrews,et al.  Effects of Metering Precision and Terminal Controllability on Runway Throughput , 1993 .

[5]  Shahab Hasan,et al.  JPDO Case Study of NextGen High Density Operations , 2009 .

[6]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Airport Arrival Capacity Benefits Due to Improved Scheduling Accuracy , 2005 .

[7]  Bernd Korn,et al.  4D TRAJECTORY MANAGEMENT IN THE EXTENDED TMA: COUPLING AMAN AND 4D FMS FOR OPTI-MIZED APPROACH TRAJECTORIES , 2006 .

[8]  John E. Robinson,et al.  A Concept for Robust, High Density Terminal Air Traffic Operations , 2010 .

[9]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  Field evaluation of Descent Advisor trajectory prediction accuracy , 1996 .

[10]  Jane Thipphavong,et al.  Design Considerations for a New Terminal Area Arrival Scheduler , 2010 .

[11]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Design of Center-TRACON Automation System , 1993 .

[12]  Dallas Denery,et al.  The Dynamic Planner: The Sequencer, Scheduler, and Runway Allocator for Air Traffic Control Automation , 2013 .

[13]  Harry N. Swenson,et al.  Design and Operational Evaluation of the Traffic Management Advisor at the Ft. Worth Air Route Traffic Control Center , 1997 .

[14]  Todd J. Callantine,et al.  HUMAN-INTHE-LOOP SIMULATION OF TRAJECTORY-BASED TERMINAL-AREA OPERATIONS , 2010 .

[15]  John E. Robinson,et al.  Benefits of Continuous Descent Operations in High-Density Terminal Airspace Under Scheduling Constraints , 2010 .