An assessment of privacy preservation in crowdsourcing approaches: Towards GDPR compliance

The increasing use of Social Media has transformed them into valuable tools, able to provide answers and decision support in public policy formulation. This has resulted in the emergence of new e-participation paradigms, such as crowdsourcing approaches, aiming to drive more constructive interactions between governments and citizens or experts, in order to exploit their knowledge, opinions, and ideas when tackling complex societal problems. However, the continuous exposure of the average users, without or with limited awareness of the dangers of the disclosure of sensitive data, remains a threat to the preservation of their information privacy. The upcoming EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) about the protection of personal data is especially well timed, and forces for revision of the processes followed related to the manipulation of personal data within public participation methods. Towards this direction, a thorough examination of three advanced methods of crowdsourcing in public policy-making processes is conducted in the current paper, analysing the data collection and processing methods they encompass. Then, an assessment of their compliance with fundamental privacy requirements is presented. The research contributes to the identification of challenges that crowdsourcing, and in general, e-participation approaches impose with regard to privacy protection. Further research directions include the implementation of techniques that can satisfy the identified requirements.

[1]  Mengyuan Guan,et al.  Crowdsourcing Leakage of Personally Identifiable Information via Sina Microblog , 2014, IOV.

[2]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Fostering Social Innovation through Multiple Social Media Combinations , 2014, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[3]  Ines Mergel Opening Government : Designing Open Innovation Processes to Collaborate With External Problem Solvers , 2014 .

[4]  K. Desouza,et al.  Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector : the Case of Challenge.gov , 2013 .

[5]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[6]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Towards an Integrated and Inclusive Platform for Open Innovation in the Public Sector , 2017, e-Democracy.

[7]  Setsuo Ohsuga,et al.  INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VERY LARGE DATA BASES , 1977 .

[8]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[9]  A. Pfitzmann,et al.  A terminology for talking about privacy by data minimization: Anonymity, Unlinkability, Undetectability, Unobservability, Pseudonymity, and Identity Management , 2010 .

[10]  Jason Smith,et al.  The Challenges of Challenge.Gov: Adopting Private Sector Business Innovations in the Federal Government , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  J. West,et al.  New frontiers in open innovation , 2014 .

[12]  Haralambos Mouratidis,et al.  Supporting Privacy by Design Using Privacy Process Patterns , 2017, SEC.

[13]  Stefanos Gritzalis,et al.  Addressing privacy requirements in system design: the PriS method , 2008, Requirements Engineering.

[14]  Martin Schader,et al.  Crowdsourcing Information Systems - Definition, Typology, and Design , 2012, ICIS.

[15]  Hironori Washizaki,et al.  A survey on security patterns , 2008 .

[16]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Crowdsourcing and human computation: systems, studies and platforms , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[18]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  USENIX Association , 1992 .

[19]  Norshidah Mohamed,et al.  Information privacy concerns, antecedents and privacy measure use in social networking sites: Evidence from Malaysia , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Capturing location-privacy preferences: quantifying accuracy and user-burden tradeoffs , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Ines Mergel,et al.  A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Elena Kolesnikova,et al.  "It Won't Happen To Me!": Self-Disclosure in Online Social Networks , 2009, AMCIS.

[23]  Hongzhi Wang,et al.  Brief survey of crowdsourcing for data mining , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Alexandru V. Roman,et al.  New Questions for E-Government: Efficiency but not (yet?) Democracy , 2013, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[26]  Hisashi Kashima,et al.  Preserving worker privacy in crowdsourcing , 2014, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[27]  Panos Kalnis,et al.  Private queries in location based services: anonymizers are not necessary , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[28]  Alimohammad Shahri,et al.  Crowdsourcing: A taxonomy and systematic mapping study , 2015, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[29]  Ines Mergel Opening Government , 2015 .

[30]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction , 2012, Information Systems Frontiers.

[31]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Evaluating Advanced Forms of Social Media Use in Government , 2013, AMCIS.

[32]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries , 2012 .

[33]  Cyrus Shahabi,et al.  A Framework for Protecting Worker Location Privacy in Spatial Crowdsourcing , 2014, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[34]  A. Acquisti,et al.  Digital privacy : theory, technologies, and practices , 2007 .

[35]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  Privacy and Reliability in Crowdsourcing Service Delivery , 2012, 2012 Annual SRII Global Conference.

[36]  Stefanos Gritzalis,et al.  Supporting the design of privacy-aware business processes via privacy process patterns , 2017, 2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).

[37]  S. Fischer-Hübner IT-Security and Privacy: Design and Use of Privacy-Enhancing Security Mechanisms , 2001 .

[38]  Divesh Srivastava,et al.  Differentially Private Spatial Decompositions , 2011, 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering.

[39]  Walid G. Aref,et al.  Casper*: Query processing for location services without compromising privacy , 2006, TODS.

[40]  Buddhadeb Halder Crowdsourcing collection of data for crisis governance in the post-2015 world: potential offers and crucial challenges , 2014, ICEGOV.

[41]  Jan O. Borchers A pattern approach to interaction design , 2001, DIS '00.

[42]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government innovation through social media , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  A privacy-preserving task recommendation framework for mobile crowdsourcing , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[44]  J. C. Cannon Privacy: What Developers and IT Professionals Should Know , 2004 .

[45]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations , 1983 .

[46]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Passive Expert-Sourcing for Policy Making in the European Union , 2016, ePart.

[47]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Empirical models of privacy in location sharing , 2010, UbiComp.

[48]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Mapping government social media research and moving it forward: A framework and a research agenda , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[50]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Francesco Molinari,et al.  Framing Web 2.0 in the Process of Public Sector Innovation: Going Down the Participation Ladder , 2010 .

[52]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Policy making 2.0: From theory to practice , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[53]  George T. Duncan,et al.  Enhancing Access to Microdata while Protecting Confidentiality: Prospects for the Future , 1991 .

[54]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Promoting open innovation in the public sector through social media monitoring , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  Social media monitoring: Responsive governance in the shadow of surveillance? , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[56]  Nicholas C. Zingale,et al.  A Framework for Using Crowdsourcing in Government , 2016, Social Entrepreneurship.