Topological and Graph-Coloring Conditions on the Parameter-Independent Stability of Second-Order Networked Systems

In this paper, we study parameter-independent stability in qualitatively heterogeneous passive networked systems containing damped and undamped nodes. Given the graph topology and a set of damped nodes, we ask if output consensus is achieved for all system parameter values. For given parameter values, an eigenspace analysis is used to determine output consensus. The extension to parameter-independent stability is characterized by a coloring problem, named the richly balanced coloring (RBC) problem. The RBC problem asks if all nodes of the graph can be colored red, blue and black in such a way that (i) every damped node is black, (ii) every black node has blue neighbors if and only if it has red neighbors, and (iii) not all nodes in the graph are black. Such a colored graph is referred to as a richly balanced colored graph. Parameter-independent stability is guaranteed if there does not exist a richly balanced coloring. The RBC problem is shown to cover another well-known graph coloring scheme known as zero forcing sets. That is, if the damped nodes form a zero forcing set in the graph, then a richly balanced coloring does not exist and thus, parameter-independent stability is guaranteed. However, the full equivalence of zero forcing sets and parameter-independent stability holds only true for tree graphs. For more general graphs with few fundamental cycles an algorithm, named chord node coloring, is proposed that significantly outperforms a brute-force search for solving the NP-complete RBC problem.

[1]  Darren D. Row Zero forcing number: Results for computation and comparison with other graph parameters , 2011 .

[2]  Zoran Vukic Nonlinear Control Systems , 2003 .

[3]  Frank Allgöwer,et al.  Duality and network theory in passivity-based cooperative control , 2013, Autom..

[4]  Claudio De Persis,et al.  An internal model approach to frequency regulation in inverter-based microgrids with time-varying voltages , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  Ferdinand Svaricek,et al.  Strong structural controllability of linear systems revisited , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[6]  M. Kanat Camlibel,et al.  Zero Forcing Sets and Controllability of Dynamical Systems Defined on Graphs , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  Giuseppe Notarstefano,et al.  On the Reachability and Observability of Path and Cycle Graphs , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Xiang Li,et al.  Pinning a complex dynamical network to its equilibrium , 2004, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap..

[9]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Stability analysis of networked systems containing damped and undamped nodes , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[10]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Port-Hamiltonian Systems on Graphs , 2011, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[11]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Controllability of Multi-Agent Systems from a Graph-Theoretic Perspective , 2009, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[12]  Ali Saberi,et al.  Output synchronization for heterogeneous networks of introspective right‐invertible agents , 2014 .

[13]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  Graph multiplication , 1959 .

[14]  Bernhard Bauer,et al.  Decentralized Real-Time Control of Water Distribution Networks Using Self-Organizing Multi-agent Systems , 2010, 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems.

[15]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Synchronization of Dynamical Networks With Nonidentical Nodes: Criteria and Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[16]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  On robust synchronization of heterogeneous linear multi-agent systems with static couplings , 2015, Autom..

[17]  David J. Hill,et al.  Transient Stability Analysis of Multimachine Power Networks with Linear Frequency Dependent Loads , 1982 .

[18]  Kathryn Fraughnaugh,et al.  Introduction to graph theory , 1973, Mathematical Gazette.

[19]  Frank Allgöwer,et al.  Hierarchical Clustering of Dynamical Networks Using a Saddle-Point Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  D. Helbing Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems , 2000, cond-mat/0012229.

[21]  M. Kanat Camlibel,et al.  Strong targeted controllability of dynamical networks , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[22]  Jean-Charles Delvenne,et al.  Zero forcing number, constraint matchings and strong structural controllability , 2014, ArXiv.

[23]  M. Areak,et al.  Passivity as a design tool for group coordination , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[24]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Pinning control and synchronization on complex dynamical networks , 2014, International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems.

[25]  Ali Saberi,et al.  Output synchronization for heterogeneous networks of non-introspective agents , 2012, Autom..

[26]  W. Haemers Zero forcing sets and minimum rank of graphs , 2008 .

[27]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  Partial Network Synchronization Using Diffusive Dynamic Couplings , 2014 .

[29]  Florian Dörfler,et al.  Kron Reduction of Graphs With Applications to Electrical Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[30]  Ali Saberi,et al.  Output synchronization for heterogeneous networks of non-introspective, non-right-invertible agents , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[31]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Port-Hamiltonian Systems Theory: An Introductory Overview , 2014, Found. Trends Syst. Control..

[32]  M.L.J. Hautus,et al.  Controllability and observability conditions of linear autonomous systems , 1969 .