Monitoring and Evaluation of Reef Protected Areas by Local Fishers in the Philippines: Tightening the Adaptive Management Cycle

Monitoring by local community managers tightens the adaptive management cycle by linking management more closely with its evaluation, so management actions become more responsive to the field situation. Local community volunteers, usually fishers, managing coral reef protected areas in the Philippines used simple methods (e.g. snorkeling fish visual census) to periodically monitor and evaluate reef protection together with professional marine biologists. Except for estimates of hard coral, data collected by local volunteers were not significantly correlated with data collected by biologists (specifically abundance estimates of sand, major reef fish carnivores, and fish herbivores). Community-collected fish data generally have higher variance and show higher abundances than biologist-collected data. Nonetheless, though the data was less precise, the locally based monitoring identified or confirmed the need for management actions that were generic in nature (e.g. stronger enforcement, organizational strengthening, etc.). The locally based monitoring also encouraged cooperation among stakeholders and prompted a management response. Little time and financing is required after initial establishment and replication has been increasing. However, sustainability depends upon the communities’ perceived added-value of undertaking the monitoring and input from a paid and/or more committed local person (e.g. government) who occasionally conducts monitoring himself/herself and supervises the community monitoring. Management impact depends heavily upon good integration with active management interventions outside the monitoring effort per se

[1]  Finn Danielsen,et al.  Does Monitoring Matter? A Quantitative Assessment of Management Decisions from Locally-based Monitoring of Protected Areas , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[2]  Peter J. Mumby,et al.  A critical assessment of data derived from coral cay conservation volunteers , 1995 .

[3]  D. Obura Participatory monitoring of shallow tropical marine fisheries by artisanal fishers in Diani, Kenya , 2001 .

[4]  John W. McManus,et al.  Reefs at Risk: A Map-Based Indicator of Threats to the World's Coral Reefs , 1998 .

[5]  D. Obura,et al.  Monitoring of fish and fish catches by local fishermen in Kenya and Tanzania , 2002 .

[6]  C. R. Henson Conclusion , 1969 .

[7]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Survey manual for tropical marine resources , 1994 .

[8]  Fred Wells,et al.  Marine Biodiversity Hotspots and Conservation Priorities for Tropical Reefs , 2002, Science.

[9]  M. Poulsen,et al.  Projects Come, Projects Go: Lessons from Participatory Monitoring in Southern Laos , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[10]  Lauretta Burke,et al.  Reefs at Risk in Southeast Asia , 2002 .

[11]  W. Darwall,et al.  An evaluation of the suitability of non-specialist volunteer researchers for coral reef fish surveys. Mafia Island, Tanzania — A case study , 1996 .

[12]  Alan T. White,et al.  Coral Reef Monitoring for Management , 2001 .

[13]  G. De’ath,et al.  Effects of Training on Observer Performance in Assessing Benthic Cover by Means of the Manta Tow Technique , 1996 .

[14]  B. Semmens,et al.  Fish Census Data Generated by Non-experts In the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary , 2000 .

[15]  Emily F. Schmitt Lavin,et al.  Analysis of a volunteer method for collecting fish presence and abundance data in the Florida Keys , 1996 .

[16]  B. Semmens,et al.  An Analysis of Fish Survey Data Generated by Nonexpert Volunteers in the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary , 1998 .

[17]  R. Pollnac,et al.  Discovering factors that influence the success of community-based marine protected areas in the Visayas, Philippines , 2001 .