Assessment of geometric and mechanical parameters in wheelchair seating: a variability study.

A measurement method has been developed to quantify the posture of able-bodied subjects seated in their wheelchair. Fourteen geometric parameters were measured in order to represent the pelvis, trunk and lower limbs orientations. They were defined by digitizing the three-dimensional (3-D) position of 23 anatomical landmarks using a mechanical articulated arm (Microscribe3D, Immersion Corporation). Mechanical parameters were used to measure the maximum pressure, mean pressure and peak pressure gradient on the seat and the back of the wheelchair using a force sensing array (Vista Medical, Inc.). A third set of parameters combining mechanical and geometric measurements were defined to represent pelvic tilt and ischial pressure orientations. However, different types of errors are associated to the measurement of these geometric and mechanical parameters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these errors and their impact on the precision of the various parameters on a sample group of five able-bodied subjects. Results showed that variability of most of the geometric parameters is below 2 degrees with the sagittal rotation of the pelvis presenting the highest variability (3.8 degrees) and the thigh angle the lowest one (0.5 degrees). The variability of the mechanical parameters were respectively equal to 4.9% for the mean pressure, 9.3% for the peak pressure gradient and 16.9% for the maximum pressure under ischial tuberosities. It is suggested that the method proposed in this paper could be used as an accurate procedure to characterize the posture of subjects sitting in a wheelchair.

[1]  H. Lindman Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs , 1974 .

[2]  A F Mak,et al.  Posture effect on seating interface biomechanics: comparison between two seating cushions. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Geometry parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the shoulder system. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Kao-Chi Chung,et al.  Correlation of Transducer Systems for Monitoring Tissue Interface Pressures , 1988 .

[5]  I. D. Swain,et al.  The effects of posture, body mass index and wheelchair adjustment on interface pressure , 1997 .

[6]  Yuntao Cui,et al.  Locating the Pelvis in the Seated Automobile Driver , 1996 .

[7]  V Allen,et al.  Accuracy of interface pressure measurement systems. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[8]  D L Bader,et al.  Pressure distribution under the ischium of normal subjects. , 1986, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[9]  D. Hobson Comparative effects of posture on pressure and shear at the body-seat interface. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  V Allen,et al.  Repeatability of subject/bed interface pressure measurements. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[11]  D. Hobson,et al.  Seated Lumbar/Pelvic Alignment: A Comparison Between Spinal Cord-Injured and Noninjured Groups , 1992, Spine.

[12]  E Trefler,et al.  Prescription and positioning: Evaluating the physically disabled individual for wheelchair seating , 1991, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  Dennis Zacharkow Wheelchair posture and pressure sores , 1984 .

[14]  M Ferguson-Pell,et al.  Prototype development and comparative evaluation of wheelchair pressure mapping system. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.