Rate-Based Equilibria in Collision Channels with Fading

We consider a wireless collision channel, shared by a finite number of users who transmit to a common base station. Each user wishes to minimize its average transmission rate (or power investment), subject to minimum throughput demand. The channel quality between each user and the base station is randomly time-varying, and partially observed by the user through Channel State Information (CSI) signals. Assuming that all users employ stationary, CSI-dependent transmission policies, we investigate the properties of the Nash equilibrium of the resulting game between users. We characterize the feasible region of user's throughput demands, and provide lower bounds on the channel capacity that hold both for symmetric and non-symmetric users. Our equilibrium analysis reveals that, when the throughput demands are feasible, there exist exactly two Nash equilibrium points, with one strictly better than the other (in terms of power investment) for each user. We further demonstrate that the performance gap between the two equilibria may be arbitrarily large. This motivates the need for distributed mechanisms that lead to the better equilibrium. To that end, we suggest a simple greedy (best-response) mechanism, and prove convergence to the better equilibrium. Some important stability properties of this mechanism in face of changing user population are derived as well.

[1]  Stephen B. Wicker,et al.  Stability of Slotted Aloha with Multipacket Reception and Selfish Users , 2003, INFOCOM 2003.

[2]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Fading Channels: Information-Theoretic and Communication Aspects , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Stephen B. Wicker,et al.  The Analysis of a Game Theoretic MAC Protocol for Wireless Networks , 2006, 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[4]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Slotted Aloha as a game with partial information , 2004, Comput. Networks.

[5]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Selfish routing and the price of anarchy , 2005 .

[6]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Space Division Multiple Access With a Sum Feedback Rate Constraint , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Discrete Power Control: Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Optimization , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  Ishai Menache,et al.  Decentralized Rate Regulation in Random Access Channels , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  Ishai Menache,et al.  Efficient Rate-Constrained Nash Equilibrium in Collision Channels with State Information , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[10]  Eitan Altman,et al.  A survey on networking games in telecommunications , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Stephen B. Wicker,et al.  Stability of multipacket slotted Aloha with selfish users and perfect information , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[12]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  What is the value of limited feedback for MIMO channels? , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  George Kesidis,et al.  Equilibria of a noncooperative game for heterogeneous users of an ALOHA network , 2002, IEEE Communications Letters.

[14]  Sergio VerdÂ,et al.  Fading Channels: InformationTheoretic and Communications Aspects , 2000 .

[15]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Data Networks , 1986 .

[16]  Randall Berry,et al.  Distributed approaches for exploiting multiuser diversity in wireless networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  Lang Tong,et al.  Exploiting decentralized channel state information for random access , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.