Towards improving wildland firefighter situational awareness through daily fire behaviour risk assessments in the US Northern Rockies and Northern Great Basin

Wildland firefighters must assess potential fire behaviour in order to develop appropriate strategies and tactics that will safely meet objectives. Fire danger indices integrate surface weather conditions to quantify potential variations in fire spread rates and intensities and therefore should closely relate to observed fire behaviour. These indices could better inform fire management decisions if they were linked directly to observed fire behaviour. Here, we present a simple framework for relating fire danger indices to observed categorical wildland fire behaviour. Ordinal logistic regressions are used to model the probabilities of five distinct fire behaviour categories that are then combined with a safety-based weight function to calculate a Fire Behaviour Risk rating that can plotted over time and spatially mapped. We demonstrate its development and use across three adjacent US National Forests. Finally, we compare predicted fire behaviour risk ratings with observed variations in satellite-measured fire radiative power and we link these models with spatial fire danger maps to demonstrate the utility of this approach for landscape-scale fire behaviour risk assessment. This approach transforms fire weather conditions into simple and actionable fire behaviour risk metrics that wildland firefighters can use to support decisions that meet required objectives and keep people safe.

[1]  B. Quayle,et al.  A Project for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity , 2007 .

[2]  P. McCullagh Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data , 1985 .

[3]  Naomi S. Altman,et al.  Quantile regression , 2019, Nature Methods.

[4]  J. Randerson,et al.  Assessing variability and long-term trends in burned area by merging multiple satellite fire products , 2009 .

[5]  Christopher I. Roos,et al.  The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth , 2011, Journal of biogeography.

[6]  M. Rollins LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment , 2009 .

[7]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire , 2005 .

[8]  J. Abatzoglou Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling , 2013 .

[9]  W. Jolly,et al.  Modeling topographic influences on fuel moisture and fire danger in complex terrain to improve wildland fire management decision support , 2011 .

[10]  Isaac C. Grenfell,et al.  The relationship of large fire occurrence with drought and fire danger indices in the western USA, 1984-2008: the role of temporal scale , 2013 .

[11]  Martin E. Alexander,et al.  Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities , 1982 .

[12]  M. Wooster,et al.  Fire radiative energy for quantitative study of biomass burning: derivation from the BIRD experimental satellite and comparison to MODIS fire products. , 2003 .

[13]  David D. Parrish,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL REANALYSIS , 2006 .

[14]  C. Justice,et al.  Potential global fire monitoring from EOS‐MODIS , 1998 .

[15]  Teri A. Crosby,et al.  How to Detect and Handle Outliers , 1993 .

[16]  M. E. Alexander,et al.  Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System: An Overview , 1989 .

[17]  D. Loftsgaarden,et al.  Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis , 2003 .

[18]  J. Horel,et al.  An evaluation of fire danger and behaviour indices in the Great Lakes Region calculated from station and gridded weather information , 2014 .

[19]  Grant J. Williamson,et al.  Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013 , 2015, Nature Communications.