Environmental Factors Influencing Auto Burglary

Although large numbers of crimes are committed in parks each year, little is known about the ways in which offenders use park settings to commit these crimes. Such knowledge would allow park managers to evaluate crime risk and opportunity and to formulate response strategies. A case study of auto burglary in Washington, D.C., examined the relationship between park setting and auto burglary. A focus group, extensive on-site interviews with plainclothes police, and analysis of crime sites were used to reveal the scripts and behaviors of auto burglars. The results are consistent with fundamental theories of environmental criminology and suggest that situational features are in fact used by offenders and that offenders adapt their behaviors to the opportunities and risks provided by each setting. In particular, a park’s physical features can reduce effort and risk by offering concealment, which is necessary for identifying targets and for sorting stolen valuables.

[1]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  PARKING PATTERNS AND CAR THEFT RISKS: POLICY-RELEVANT FINDINGS FROM THE BRITISH CRIME SURVEY , 1995 .

[2]  S. Atkins The influence of street lighting on crime and fear of crime , 1991 .

[3]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[4]  Barbara B. Brown,et al.  Residential burglars judge risk: The role of territoriality , 1993 .

[5]  Barbara B. Brown,et al.  Residential territories: cues to burglary vulnerability ( USA). , 1985 .

[6]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Territoriality and residential crime: a conceptual framework. , 1982 .

[7]  Patricia L. Brantingham,et al.  Patterns in Crime , 1984 .

[8]  D. Stevens Predatory rapists and victim selection techniques. , 1994 .

[9]  D. Walsh Burglars on the Job, Streetlife and Residential Break-ins , 1995 .

[10]  Neil Alan Weiner,et al.  Crime Prevention through Environmental Design , 1971 .

[11]  J. Cohen,et al.  The Geography of Crime , 1941 .

[12]  R. Clarke Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies , 1992 .

[13]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[14]  Philip J. Cook,et al.  The Demand and Supply of Criminal Opportunities , 1986, Crime and Justice.

[15]  P. Brantingham,et al.  Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment , 1993 .

[16]  Paul F. Cromwell,et al.  Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary , 1990 .

[17]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  How Young House Burglars Choose Targets , 1988 .

[18]  N. Morris,et al.  Crime and justice : an annual review of research , 1980 .

[19]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Fear of Crime in Relation to Three Exterior Site Features , 1992 .

[20]  Simon Hakim,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Commercial Burglaries: The Evidence Examined , 1996 .

[21]  Sean E Michael,et al.  Effects of vegetation on crime in urban parks , 1994 .

[22]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Recognition memory performance and residential burglary , 1992 .

[23]  John B. Black,et al.  Knowledge Structures , 1986 .

[24]  Barry Poyner,et al.  Design Against Crime: Beyond Defensible Space , 1983 .