Reducing subjectivity in the assessment of the job environment: development of the Factual Autonomy Scale (FAS)

Self-report measures of job stressors have been criticized for being too subjective, rendering relations with other variables inconclusive. The Factual Autonomy Scale (FAS) was developed to reduce subjectivity by careful choice of fact-based items. Results of two studies showed that when compared to the Job Diagnostic Survey autonomy scale, the FAS demonstrated superior convergent validity with alternate sources (supervisors in Study 1 and coworkers in Study 2), and discriminant validity when correlated with the remaining JDS core characteristics subscales. In addition, the FAS was correlated to a lesser extent than the JDS autonomy scale with job satisfaction. Incumbent FAS scores and not JDS scores correlated significantly with job performance as assessed by supervisors. It is suggested that it is feasible to develop fact-based items for scales of the work environment that reduce the degree of subjectivity of responses. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  T. Beehr,et al.  Back to basics: Re-examination of Demand-Control Theory of occupational stress , 2001 .

[2]  C. Cooper.  Theories of organizational stress , 2000 .

[3]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Using the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[4]  A. Sagie,et al.  Actual and Preferred Work Schedules and Scheduling Control as Determinants of Job-Related Attitudes. , 2000 .

[5]  Kelly L. Zellars,et al.  An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process , 1999 .

[6]  J. Schaubroeck.  Should the subjective be the objective? On studying mental processes, coping behavior, and actual exposures in organizational stress research , 1999 .

[7]  M. Frese,et al.  On the importance of the objective environment in stress and attribution theory. Counterpoint to Perrewé and Zellars , 1999 .

[8]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The role of negative affectivity in employee reactions to job characteristics: Bias effect or substantive effect? , 1999 .

[9]  Dieter Zapf,et al.  ‘Shared job strain’: A new approach for assessing the validity of job stress measurements , 1996 .

[10]  Jia Lin Xie,et al.  Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? , 1995 .

[11]  Paul R. Jackson,et al.  New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility. , 1993 .

[12]  D. J. Dwyer,et al.  The effects of job demands and control on employee attendance and satisfaction , 1991 .

[13]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Thomas D. Taber,et al.  A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE JOB DIAGNOSTIC SURVEY , 1990 .

[16]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Relation of job stressors to affective, health, and performance outcomes: a comparison of multiple data sources. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Y. Fried,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: A REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[18]  Paul E. Spector.  Interactive effects of perceived control and job stressors on affective reactions and health outcomes for clerical workers , 1987 .

[19]  F. Drasgow,et al.  A Revision of the Job Diagnostic Survey: Elimination of a Measurement Artifact , 1987 .

[20]  Paul E. Spector.  Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work , 1986 .

[21]  William H. Glick,et al.  Method Versus Substance: How Strong are Underlying Relationships Between Job Characteristics and Attitudinal Outcomes? , 1986 .

[22]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  Confirmatory Analytic Tests of Three Causal Models Relating Job Perceptions to Job Satisfaction. , 1986 .

[23]  R. Noe,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Job Characteristics to Job Satisfaction , 1985 .

[24]  Seymour Adler,et al.  Job characteristics and job satisfaction: When cause becomes consequence , 1985 .

[25]  D. Caldwell,et al.  Task perceptions and job satisfaction: A question of causality. , 1982 .

[26]  William H. Glick,et al.  The job characteristics approach to task design: A critical review. , 1981 .

[27]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[28]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[29]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[30]  William J. Haga,et al.  A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process , 1975 .

[31]  J. Hackman,et al.  Employee reactions to job characteristics. , 1971 .

[32]  Aaron Lowin,et al.  The influence of level of performance on managerial style: an experimental object-lesson in the ambiguity of correlational data , 1968 .

[33]  E. J. Williams.  The Comparison of Regression Variables , 1959 .

[34]  Paul E. Spector.  A Control Theory of the Job Stress Process , 1999 .

[35]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Relations of incumbent affect-related personality traits with incumbent and objective measures of characteristics of jobs , 1995 .

[36]  Paul E. Spector.  A Consideration of the Validity and Meaning of Self-Report Measures of Job Conditions , 1992 .

[37]  J. Hackman,et al.  Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey , 1975 .