IM [@work]: adoption of instant messaging in a knowledge worker organisation

After massive and rapid consumer adoption in recent years, instant messaging (IM) applications are beginning to move into the workplace. We investigated the adoption of IM from four months before to three months after it was formally introduced in a mid-sized organization involved in knowledge work. Employees were free, within reasonable limits for private use, to use IM or not, not only with internal contacts (colleagues) but also with external contacts (work relations, friends, family). Based on data obtained before and after introduction from surveys, interviews, and communication traffic logs, we investigated the adoption of IM by individual users and pairs of users. We found a sudden and stable fourfold increase in IM use after introduction, both in terms of users and the number of conversations. IM users primarily report that IM improves the way they reach others and can be reached themselves. Technology self-efficacy, perceived compatibility of IM with work and pressure from social contacts at work to use IM explained best why some employees adopted and used IM more than others.

[1]  Tom W. Carroll,et al.  Two models of Innovation Diffusion , 1968 .

[2]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[3]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[4]  Ellen Francik,et al.  Putting innovation to work: adoption strategies for multimedia communication systems , 1991, CACM.

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Owen Daly-Jones,et al.  Informal workplace communication: what is it like and how might we support it? , 1994, CHI '94.

[7]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Victoria Bellotti,et al.  Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team , 1996, CSCW '96.

[9]  Harry C. Benham,et al.  Information technology adoption: evidence from a voice mail introduction , 1996, CPRS.

[10]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[11]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  The adoption and use of BABBLE: A field study of chat in the workplace , 1999, ECSCW.

[12]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (Tri) , 2000 .

[13]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[14]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Examining workgroup influence on technology usage: a community of practice perspective , 2000, SIGCPR '00.

[15]  Weidong Xia,et al.  The influence of persuasion, training and experience on user perceptions and acceptance of IT innovation , 2000, ICIS.

[16]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Diffusion of a collaborative technology cross distance , 2001, GROUP.

[17]  Erik D. Goodman,et al.  New methods for studying global virtual teams: towards a multi-faceted approach , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Instant messaging in teen life , 2002, CSCW '02.

[19]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Introducing instant messaging and chat in the workplace , 2002, CHI.

[20]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace , 2002, CSCW '02.

[21]  M.H.P. Kleijnen,et al.  Consumer acceptance of wireless finance , 2004 .