Optical bench performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses

Purpose To compare the optical performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): the Acrysof IQ Panoptix (+2.17 diopter [D]/+3.25 D IOL), AT LISA Tri 839MP (+1.66 D/+3.33 D IOL), and Finevision Micro F (+1.75 D/+3.50 D IOL). Setting Alcon Research Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. Design Experimental study. Methods The 3 trifocal IOLs were compared using optical performance tests. To measure image quality, through‐focus modulation transfer function (MTF) curves were generated for a model eye. To assess resolution, through‐focus Badal images of an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart simulating viewing distances of infinity to 40 cm were recorded. To measure photic phenomena, simulated headlight images with a 50 &mgr;m pinhole target and a 5.0 mm pupil were obtained. Results The MTF measurements showed similar near and distance peaks for the IOLs, but the optimum intermediate peak for the +2.17 D/+3.25 D IOL was 60 cm versus 80 cm for the other 2 trifocal IOLs. Similarly, in bench Badal image testing, the optimum intermediate image was at 60 cm for the +2.17 D/+3.25 D IOL and 80 cm for the other 2 IOLs. Overall, halos surrounding simulated headlight images were equivalent for the 3 IOLs. Conclusions In bench studies, the new +2.17 D/+3.25 D trifocal IOL showed equivalent or better performance in image quality, resolution, and photic phenomena compared with the +1.66 D/+3.33 D and +1.75 D/+3.50 D trifocal IOLs. The new IOL is expected to provide better intermediate vision at 60 cm, which is preferred for real‐life tasks such as computer work, over the 80 cm intermediate distance offered by the other 2 trifocal IOLs. Financial Disclosure All authors are employees of Alcon Research, Ltd.

[1]  R. Nuijts,et al.  Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. , 2013, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  D. Atchison,et al.  The eye and visual optical instruments: Frontmatter , 1997 .

[3]  Warren E Hill,et al.  Optical bench performance of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR®, AT LISA® tri, and FineVision® intraocular lenses , 2014, Clinical ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Davison,et al.  History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  Mats Lundström,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery: guidelines based on data in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery database. , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  S. Lane,et al.  Performance of presbyopia‐correcting intraocular lenses in distance optical bench tests , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  Jorge L Alió,et al.  Outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  T. Berendschot,et al.  Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  Neil Charness,et al.  Monitor Viewing Distance for Younger and Older Workers , 2008 .

[10]  G. Boreman Modulation Transfer Function , 1998 .

[11]  Damien Gatinel,et al.  Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench , 2013, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  D. Leger,et al.  Modulation transfer function , 1987 .

[13]  Jonathan C. Javitt,et al.  Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation , 2000 .

[14]  T. Kohnen First implantation of a diffractive quadrafocal (trifocal) intraocular lens. , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  Norberto López-Gil,et al.  In vitro optical performance of nonrotational symmetric and refractive–diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses: Impact of tilt and decentration , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  K W Jacobi,et al.  Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: Clinical, functional, and quality‐of‐life outcomes: Multicenter clinical trial in Germany and Austria , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  Elements of a violence prevention program for healthcare workers. U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. , 1997, Journal of healthcare protection management : publication of the International Association for Hospital Security.

[18]  M. Leyland,et al.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  M. Leyland,et al.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[20]  Jian Ye,et al.  Comparison of Visual Performance after Implantation of 3 Types of Intraocular Lenses: Accommodative, Multifocal, and Monofocal , 2014, European journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  A Lang,et al.  Interpreting multifocal intraocular lens modulation transfer functions , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.