3D conformal planning using low segment multi-criteria IMRT optimization

Purpose: To evaluate automated multicriteria optimization (MCO)-- designed for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), but invoked with limited segmentation -- to efficiently produce high quality 3D conformal treatment (3D-CRT) plans. Methods: Ten patients previously planned with 3D-CRT were replanned with a low-segment inverse multicriteria optimized technique. The MCO-3D plans used the same number of beams, beam geometry and machine parameters of the corresponding 3D plans, but were limited to an energy of 6 MV. The MCO-3D plans were optimized using a fluence-based MCO IMRT algorithm and then, after MCO navigation, segmented with a low number of segments. The 3D and MCO-3D plans were compared by evaluating mean doses to individual organs at risk (OARs), mean doses to combined OARs, homogeneity indexes (HI), monitor units (MUs), physician preference, and qualitative assessments of planning time and plan customizability. Results: The MCO-3D plans significantly reduced the OAR mean doses and monitor units while maintaining good coverage and homogeneity of target volumes. MCO allows for more streamlined plan customization. All MCO-3D plans were preferred by physicians over their corresponding 3D plans. Conclusion: High quality 3D plans can be produced using IMRT optimization technology, resulting in automated field-in-field type plans with good monitor unit efficiency. Adopting this technology in a clinic could streamline treatment plan production.

[1]  Rasmus Bokrantz,et al.  Distributed approximation of Pareto surfaces in multicriteria radiation therapy treatment planning , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  R. Bokrantz,et al.  Deliverable navigation for multicriteria intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning by combining shared and individual apertures , 2013 .

[3]  P. Balter,et al.  Define baseline levels of segments per beam for intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery for brain, head and neck, thoracic, abdominal, and prostate applications. , 2012, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[4]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Improved planning time and plan quality through multicriteria optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Adoption of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer in the United States. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  L Xing,et al.  A unified framework for 3D radiation therapy and IMRT planning: plan optimization in the beamlet domain by constraining or regularizing the fluence map variations. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  J. Carroll,et al.  Moving Beyond Normal Accidents and High Reliability Organizations: A Systems Approach to Safety in Complex Systems , 2009 .

[9]  C. Lawton,et al.  The effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on radiation-induced second malignancies , 2009 .

[10]  Stephen Breen,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the cervical esophagus. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Sea S. Chen,et al.  Cost effectiveness of whole breast IMRT for reduction of moist desquamation , 2007 .

[12]  U. Hermanto,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas: does IMRT increase the integral dose to normal brain? , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Jie Yang,et al.  Monte Carlo based IMRT dose verification using MLC log files and R/V outputs. , 2006, Medical physics.

[14]  Joao Seco,et al.  The susceptibility of IMRT dose distributions to intrafraction organ motion: an investigation into smoothing filters derived from four dimensional computed tomography data. , 2006, Medical physics.

[15]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose. , 2005, Medical physics.

[16]  Ludvig Paul Muren,et al.  Conformal radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  Ping Xia,et al.  A new smoothing procedure to reduce delivery segments for static MLC-based IMRT planning. , 2004, Medical physics.

[18]  Christopher G Willett,et al.  Quantification of respiration-induced abdominal tumor motion and its impact on IMRT dose distributions. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  S. Webb The physical basis of IMRT and inverse planning. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  Antonio Leal,et al.  Routine IMRT verification by means of an automated Monte Carlo simulation system. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  M. Alber,et al.  Intensity modulated photon beams subject to a minimal surface smoothing constraint. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  T W Nolan,et al.  service Topic collections Notes , 2022 .

[23]  S. Webb,et al.  Inverse planning with constraints to generate smoothed intensity-modulated beams. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.