Illicit drug profiling, reflection on statistical comparisons.

This paper presents reflexions about statistical considerations on illicit drug profiling and more specifically about the calculation of threshold for determining of the seizure are linked or not. The specific case of heroin and cocaine profiling is presented with the necessary details on the target profiling variables (major alkaloids) selected and the analytical method used. Statistical approach to compare illicit drug seizures is also presented with the introduction of different scenarios dealing with different data pre-treatment or transformation of variables. The main aim consists to demonstrate the influence of data pre-treatment on the statistical outputs. A thorough study of the evolution of the true positive rate (TP) and the false positive rate (FP) in heroin and cocaine comparison is then proposed to investigate this specific topic and to demonstrate that there is no universal approach available and that the calculations have to be revaluate for each new specific application.

[1]  S Lociciro,et al.  Cocaine profiling for strategic intelligence, a cross-border project between France and Switzerland: part II. Validation of the statistical methodology for the profiling of cocaine. , 2008, Forensic Science International.

[2]  Tom Fawcett.  PRIE: a system for generating rulelists to maximize ROC performance , 2008, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[3]  Andrzej Parczewski,et al.  Application of chemometric methods in searching for illicit Leuckart amphetamine sources , 2001 .

[4]  M Chiarotti,et al.  Comparative analysis of heroin and cocaine seizures. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[5]  Michael D Cole,et al.  Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines: III. Development of the gas chromatographic method. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[6]  Michael D Cole,et al.  Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines: IV. Optimisation of sample preparation. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[7]  Laura Aalberg,et al.  Drug intelligence based on MDMA tablets data I. Organic impurities profiling. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[8]  S. Klemenc,et al.  In common batch searching of illicit heroin samples--evaluation of data by chemometrics methods. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[9]  B Caddy,et al.  Development of a harmonised pan-European method for the profiling of amphetamines. , 2001, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[10]  P. Filzmoser,et al.  Statistical Data Analysis Explained , 2008 .

[11]  Laurence Dujourdy,et al.  Headspace profiling of cocaine samples for intelligence purposes. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[12]  Pierre Margot,et al.  Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE): comparison of the performance in classification of ecstasy tablets. Part 2. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[13]  F Taroni,et al.  A methodology for illicit heroin seizures comparison in a drug intelligence perspective using large databases. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[14]  Pierre Margot,et al.  Optimization of HS-SPME/GC-MS analysis and its use in the profiling of illicit ecstasy tablets (Part 1). , 2009, Forensic science international.

[15]  Laura Aalberg,et al.  Drug intelligence based on MDMA tablets data: 2. Physical characteristics profiling. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[16]  L Dujourdy,et al.  Drug intelligence based on organic impurities in illicit MA samples. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[17]  Laurence Dujourdy,et al.  Development of a harmonised method for the profiling of amphetamines VI: Evaluation of methods for comparison of amphetamine. , 2007, Forensic science international.