The Effects of Perceptual Congruence and Sex on Subordinates' Performance Appraisals of Their Managers

In an investigation of the relationship between subordinates' perceptual congruence (SPC) and sex on subordinates' performance appraisals of their immediate managers, SPC was found to be significan...

[1]  J. Terborg,et al.  Employee reactions to supervision and work evaluation as a function of subordinate and manager sex , 1983 .

[2]  K. N. Wexley,et al.  The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[3]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Increasing productivity through performance appraisal , 1981 .

[4]  G. Graen,et al.  Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. , 1980 .

[5]  Ralph A. Alexander,et al.  Attitudinal Congruence and Similarity as Related to Interpersonal Evaluations in Manager-Subordinate Dyads , 1980 .

[6]  Stephen Brown.  Male versus female leaders: A comparison of empirical studies , 1979 .

[7]  G. Latham,et al.  Application of social-learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. , 1979 .

[8]  H. Weiss.  Subordinate imitation of supervisor behavior: The role of modeling in organizational socialization , 1977 .

[9]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION SCALES FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSES , 1977 .

[10]  J. Terborg,et al.  Women in management: A research review. , 1977 .

[11]  R. Miles,et al.  Leader Sex-Role Stereotyping in a Female-Dominated Work Culture. , 1976 .

[12]  M. Feinberg.  Effective Psychology for Managers , 1976 .

[13]  M. Petty,et al.  Moderating effects of sex of supervisor and subordinate on relationships between supervisory behavior and subordinate satisfaction. , 1975 .

[14]  Kenneth N. Wexley,et al.  Male and Female Leaders: Comparison of Performance and Behavior Patterns , 1974, Psychological reports.

[15]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Sex effects in evaluating leaders. , 1974, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach , 1974 .

[17]  T. Wall,et al.  Are deficiency scores deficient , 1973 .

[18]  G. Labovitz.  More on Subjective Executive Appraisal: An Empirical Study , 1972, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[19]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[20]  David G. Bowers,et al.  Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four-Factor Theory of Leadership , 1966 .

[21]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Attitudes Toward Management Theory as a Factor in Managers’ Relationships With Their Superiors , 1964 .

[22]  Seymour Geisser,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1963 .

[23]  Ralph M. Stogdill,et al.  New Leader Behavior Description Subscales , 1962 .

[24]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  PATTERNS OF LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR RELATED TO EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCES AND TURNOVER , 1962 .

[25]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[26]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Assessing similarity between profiles. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  A. Bandura.  Social learning theory , 1977 .

[28]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  The effect of male versus female leaders on follower satisfaction and performance , 1975 .