Active Flow Control Activities at NASA Langley

NASA Langley continues to aggressively investigate the potential advantages of active flow control over more traditional aerodynamic techniques. This paper provides an update to a previous paper and describes both the progress in the various research areas and the significant changes in the NASA research programs. The goals of the topics presented are focused on advancing the state of knowledge and understanding of controllable fundamental mechanisms in fluids as well as to address engineering challenges. An organizational view of current research activities at NASA Langley in active flow control as supported by several projects is presented. On-center research as well as NASA Langley funded contracts and grants are discussed at a relatively high level. The products of this research are to be demonstrated either in bench-top experiments, wind-tunnel investigations, or in flight as part of the fundamental NASA R&D program and then transferred to more applied research programs within NASA, DOD, and U.S. industry.

[1]  Gregory S. Jones,et al.  An Active Flow Circulation Controlled Flap Concept for General Aviation Aircraft Applications , 2002 .

[2]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Efficient Viscous Design of Realistic Aircraft Configurations , 1998 .

[4]  Laurie A. Marshall SUMMARY OF TRANSITION RESULTS FROM THE F-16XL-2 SUPERSONIC LAMINAR FLOW CONTROL EXPERIMENT , 2000 .

[5]  Robert C. Scott,et al.  Active Flow Control on the Stingray UAV: Aerodynamic Forces and Moments , 2003 .

[6]  Robert J. Englar,et al.  Circulation Control Pneumatic Aerodynamics: Blown Force and Moment Augmentation and Modification; Pa , 2000 .

[7]  John C. Lin,et al.  Parametric Investigation of a High-Lift Airfoil at High Reynolds Numbers , 1997 .

[8]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  Active Flow Control on the STINGRAY UAV: Transient Behavior , 2003 .

[9]  J. K. Wimpress AERODYNAMIC TECHNOLOGY APPLIED TO TAKEOFF AND LANDING , 1968 .

[10]  Gregory S. Jones,et al.  Advances In Pneumatic-Controlled High-Lift Systems Through Pulsed Blowing , 2003 .

[11]  John K. Wimpress,et al.  The YC-14 STOL Prototype: Its Design, Development, and Flight Test , 1998 .

[12]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Summary of the 2004 Cfd Validation Workshop on Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control , 2013 .

[13]  A. E. Washburn,et al.  Snapshot of Active Flow Control Research at NASA Langley , 2002 .

[14]  E. Stanewsky Drag reduction by shock and boundary layer control : results of the project EUROSHOCK II, supported by the European Union, 1996-1999 , 2002 .

[15]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Introduction to Flow Control , 1998 .

[16]  Karen A. Deere Summary of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Research Conducted at NASA Langley Research Center , 2003 .

[17]  Gregory S. Jones,et al.  Flow Control Research at NASA Langley in Support of High-Lift Augmentation , 2002 .

[18]  R. H. Liebeck,et al.  Design of the Blended Wing Body Subsonic Transport , 2002 .

[19]  A. Seifert,et al.  Active Flow Separation Control on Wall-Mounted Hump at High Reynolds Numbers , 2002 .

[20]  C. Yao,et al.  Application of Excitation from Multiple Locations on a Simplified High-Lift System , 2004 .

[21]  Wolfgang Schneider The Importance of Aerodynamics in the Development of Commercially Successful Transport Aircraft , 2001 .

[22]  D. MacMartin,et al.  Flow Control Opportunities in Gas Turbine Engines , 2000 .

[23]  Kwing-So Choi,et al.  TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYER CONTROL BY MEANS OF SPANWISE-WALL OSCILLATION , 1998 .

[24]  B. Allan,et al.  Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Flush-Mounted, S-Duct Inlets , 2004 .

[25]  Karen A. Deere,et al.  Computational Study of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring using Separation Control in a Nozzle , 2003 .

[26]  William E. Milholen,et al.  On the Application of Contour Bumps for Transonic Drag Reduction(Invited) , 2005 .

[27]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Stability enhancement by boundary control in 2-D channel flow , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[28]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Proceedings of the 2004 Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control , 2007 .

[29]  Ruben Rathnasingham,et al.  Active control of turbulent boundary layers , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Luther N. Jenkins,et al.  Active Flow Control on a Boundary-Layer-Ingesting Inlet , 2004 .

[31]  Chung-Sheng Yao,et al.  Synthetic Jet Flow Field Database for CFD Validation , 2004 .

[32]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Stability enhancement by boundary control in 2D channel flow. I. Regularity of solutions , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).

[33]  Jack N. Nielsen,et al.  Proceedings of the Circulation-Control Workshop, 1986 , 1987 .

[34]  Robert Liebeck,et al.  An experimental investigation of boundary layer ingestion in a diffusing S-duct with and without passive flow control , 1999 .

[35]  Bart A. Singer,et al.  Aerodynamics for Revolutionary Air Vehicles , 2003 .

[36]  Kenrick A. Waithe Source Term Model for Vortex Generator Vanes in a Navier-Stokes Computer Code , 2004 .

[37]  S Sakurai,et al.  Study of the Application of Separation Control by Unsteady Excitation to Civil Transport Aircraft , 1999 .

[38]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  An implicit upwind algorithm for computing turbulent flows on unstructured grids , 1994 .

[39]  Michael Amitay,et al.  CONTROLLED TRANSIENTS OF FLOW REATTACHMENT OVER STALLED AIRFOILS , 2002, Proceeding of Second Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[40]  C. Novak,et al.  An LDV investigation of a circulation control airfoil flowfield , 1986 .

[41]  Avi Seifert,et al.  Active Control of Separation From the Flap of a Supercritical Airfoil , 2003 .

[42]  Jane Abramson Two-Dimensional Subsonic Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Two Related Cambered 15-Percent Thick Circulation Control Airfoils , 1977 .

[43]  Luther N. Jenkins,et al.  The Isolated Synthetic Jet in Crossflow: A Benchmark for Flow Control Simulation , 2013 .

[44]  E Stanewsky,et al.  Adaptive wing and flow control technology , 2001 .

[45]  Scott G. Anders,et al.  F-16XL-2 Supersonic Laminar Flow Control Flight Test Experiment , 1999 .

[46]  David E. Parekh,et al.  AVIA: Adaptive Virtual Aerosurface , 2000 .

[47]  Karen Deere,et al.  Summary of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Research at NASA Langley Research Center , 2003 .

[48]  C. Novak,et al.  Experimental investigations of the circular wall jet on a circulation control airfoil , 1987 .

[49]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  NASA micro-aero-adaptive control , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[50]  Scott O. Kjelgaard,et al.  The Basic Aerodynamics Research Tunnel - A facility dedicated to code validation , 1988 .

[51]  Norberto Mangiavacchi,et al.  Suppression of turbulence in wall‐bounded flows by high‐frequency spanwise oscillations , 1992 .

[52]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  Active Flow Control on the STINGRAY UAV: Physical Mechanisms , 2004 .

[53]  L. Veitch,et al.  Quiet Supersonic Platform Program Advanced algorithms for design and optimization of Quiet Supersonic Platforms , 2002 .

[54]  Fazle Hussain,et al.  A large-scale control strategy for drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers , 1998 .

[55]  Anthony E. Washburn,et al.  A Separation Control CFD Validation Test Case. Part 1; Baseline and Steady Suction , 2004 .

[56]  Avi Seifert,et al.  Active Control of Separation from the Slat Shoulder of a Supercritical Airfoil , 2002 .

[57]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Advanced Algorithms for Design and Optimization of Quiet Supersonic Platforms , 2002 .

[58]  Mark Drela,et al.  Design and optimization method for multi-element airfoils , 1993 .