The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification

Abstract The development of image analysis systems has facilitated progress and diversification of morphometric methods and expands the potential for using morphometry as a tool for stock identification. Identifying intraspecific groups with different life histories according to shape variation has become more powerful, based on a review of published studies and our experiences with American lobster and Atlantic salmon. Traditional multivariate morphometrics, accounting for variation in size and shape, have successfully discriminated many fish stocks. However, traditional methods have been enhanced by image processing techniques, through better data collection, more effective descriptions of shape, and new analytical tools. Properly calibrated coordinates of morphometric locations, or ‘landmarks’, are generally more efficient and precise than manual distance measurements. ‘Truss networks’ of distances between landmark coordinates provide more comprehensive coverage of form for greater discriminating power. Image analysis systems also allow more advanced ‘geometric morphometrics’, which include outline methods and landmark methods. Unfortunately, few stock identification studies have applied outline methods, and landmark methods have not been used to discriminate fishery stocks. It appears that advanced geometric methods have not been commonly applied in fishery science, because ontogenetic interpretations are difficult.

[1]  A. Nicieza Morphological variation between geographically disjunct populations of Atlantic salmon: the effects of ontogeny and habitat shift , 1995 .

[2]  Gary A. Winans,et al.  Multivariate Morphometric Variability in Pacific Salmon: Technical Demonstration , 1984 .

[3]  L. C. Cole The Population Consequences of Life History Phenomena , 1954, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[4]  J. Sévigny,et al.  Morphometric and Electrophoretic Approaches to Discrimination of Capelin (Mallotus villosus) Populations in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence , 1991 .

[5]  D. Somerton Regional Variation in the Size of Maturity of Two Species of Tanner Crab (Chionoecetes bairdi and C. opilio) in the Eastern Bering Sea, and Its Use in Defining Management Subareas , 1981 .

[6]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A revolution morphometrics. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  L. F. Marcus,et al.  Advances in Morphometrics , 1996, NATO ASI Series.

[8]  R. Nishioka,et al.  A multivariate description of change in body shape of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) during smoltification , 1987 .

[9]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology: The Geometry of Size and Shape Change, With Examples from Fishes , 1985 .

[10]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  A Comment upon the Uses of Fourier Methods in Systematics , 1982 .

[11]  A. Nicieza,et al.  Differentiation in juvenile growth and bimodality patterns between northern and southern populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) , 1994 .

[12]  H. Booke The Conundrum of the Stock Concept—Are Nature and Nurture Definable in Fishery Science? , 1981 .

[13]  F. Grandjean,et al.  Size At Sexual Maturity and Morphometric Variability in Three Populations of a Ustropotamobi Us Pallipes Pallipes (Lereboullet, 1858) According To a Restocking Strategy , 1997 .

[14]  J. Flowers,et al.  Geographic Morphometric Variation in the American Lobster , 1969 .

[15]  W. C. Leggett,et al.  Evidence of an Adaptive Basis for Geographic Variation in Body Morphology and Time of Downstream Migration of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) , 1981 .

[16]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  Principal Components of Body Shape Variation within an Endemic Radiation of Threespine Stickleback , 1996 .

[17]  F J Rohlf,et al.  On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[18]  S. Cadrin Discrimination of American lobster (Homarus americanus) stocks off southern New England on the basis of secondary sex character allometry , 1995 .

[19]  W. Templeman Local Differences in the Body Proportions of the Lobster, Homarus americanus , 1935 .

[20]  D. Cushing Fisheries Biology : A Study in Population Dynamics , 1969 .

[21]  K. Friedland,et al.  Discrimination of Norwegian farmed, ranched and wild‐origin Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., by image processing , 1994 .

[22]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  Ecological morphology of lacustrine threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. (Gasterosteidae) body shape , 1997 .

[23]  S. Ferson,et al.  Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines , 1985 .

[24]  S. McCormick Ontogeny and evolution of salinity tolerance in anadromous salmonids: Hormones and heterochrony , 1994 .

[25]  S. Cataudella,et al.  Shape Changes during the Growth of the Sea Bass, Dicentrarchus labrax (Teleostea: Perciformes), in Relation to Different Rearing Conditions , 1996 .

[26]  K. Friedland,et al.  Use of Otolith Morphology in Stock Discriminations of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) , 1994 .

[27]  Analysis of sexual dimorphism in an endangered cyprinid fish (Gila cypha Miller) using video image technology , 1993 .

[28]  F. Utter Biological Criteria for Definition of Species and Distinct Intraspecific Populations of Anadromous Salmonids Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 , 1981 .

[29]  D'arcy W. Thompson On Growth and Form , 1945 .

[30]  W. C. Leggett,et al.  Evidence of Adaptive Polygenic Variation Between Two Populations of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Native to Tributaries of the S. W. Miramichi River, N.B. , 1981 .

[31]  M. Zelditch,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Ontogenetic Shape Transformations: A Reassessment of the Piranha Genus Pygocentrus (Teleostei) , 1995 .

[32]  J. Huxley Problems of relative growth , 1932 .

[33]  K. Wada Biogeographic Patterns in Waving Display, and Body Size and Proportions of Macrophthalmus japonicus Species Complex (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae)(Taxonomy and Systematics) , 1991 .

[34]  Leslie F. Marcus,et al.  Morphometrics: Multivariate Analysis of Biological Data. , 1978 .

[35]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation , 1963 .

[36]  R. Ehrlich,et al.  Comments on the Validity of Fourier Descriptors in Systematics: A Reply to Bookstein et al. , 1983 .

[37]  I. Priede Book reviewAn assessment Of Atlantic bluefin tuna: Committee to Review Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Chairman John J. Magnuson). National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994, price £23.95, ISBN 0-309-05181-9 , 1996 .

[38]  E. Knut,et al.  Paris Meeting of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea , 1923, Nature.

[39]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  The Truss: Body Form Reconstructions in Morphometrics , 1982 .

[40]  E. Taylor,et al.  Variation in Body Morphology Among British Columbia Populations of Coho Salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch , 1985 .