Abstract : This study supported the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development, and Engineering Center (NSRDEC) effort to develop lightweight microclimate cooling systems (MCCS) for use by dismounted Soldiers by evaluating the cooling potentials of two prototype MCCS. This development is underway because it is known that military operations in warm and hot environments that require wearing helmets and body armor in addition to carrying the added weight of mission essential equipment pose a thermoregulatory challenge to Soldiers. For dismounted troops, load carriage of the cooling system imposes an additional metabolic burden and spatial configuration challenge. While HAZMAT and explosive ordnance disposal troops currently have MCCS available to them, it may be possible to extend the application for more dismounted troops by using a smaller capacity MCCS that reduces load carriage, or by using a vehicle-mounted MCCS only during rest periods. This study evaluated two liquid vapor compression systems in which the components differed in size, weight, and cooling capacity. One system (LO) was 93 cubic inches, and weighed 4.2 kg, with a cooling capacity of 120 W. The other system (HI) was 200 cubic inches, and weighed 6.5 kg with a cooling capacity of 250 W. The nominal 120 W of cooling and 250 W of cooling were each used continuously to reduce heat strain in volunteers exercising in desert (45 deg C Tdb, 20% rh) and tropic (35 deg C Tdb, 70% rh) environments while dressed and equipped for an approach march with approximately 33kg of clothing and equipment. A third experimental test (INT) was conducted using 250 W of cooling delivered intermittently only during rest periods. On this test, no cooling was delivered during exercise; however, the cooling vest was worn. A control test (NC) was also performed in each environment with no cooling provided at any time. On this test the volunteer wore neither the cooling vest nor the MCCS.
[1]
N. Ramanathan,et al.
A NEW WEIGHTING SYSTEM FOR MEAN SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE HUMAN BODY.
,
1964,
Journal of applied physiology.
[2]
Samuel N. Cheuvront,et al.
High skin temperature and hypohydration impair aerobic performance
,
2012,
Experimental physiology.
[3]
G. Borg.
Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.
,
2019,
Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[4]
Lawrence C. Katz,et al.
An Evaluation of Air Warrior Concept Aviator Ensembles With and Without Microclimate Cooling.
,
1999
.
[5]
M. Sawka,et al.
Heat Stress Control and Heat Casualty Management
,
2003
.
[6]
L. G. Berglund,et al.
Comfort and humidity
,
1998
.
[7]
J D Hardy,et al.
Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperatures.
,
1967,
Environmental research.
[8]
K B Pandolf,et al.
Cooling different body surfaces during upper and lower body exercise.
,
1987,
Journal of applied physiology.
[9]
J. Durnin,et al.
Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 Years
,
1974,
British Journal of Nutrition.
[10]
M. Sawka,et al.
Heat Stress When Wearing Body Armor
,
2001
.
[11]
Leslie Levine,et al.
Endurance Time in the Self-Contained Toxic Environment Protective Outfit (STEPO) with Personal Ice-Cooled Microclimate Cooling System (PICS) in Three Environments.
,
2003
.