THE NATURE AND NURTURE OF BARS AND DISKS

The effects that interactions produce on galaxy disks and how they modify the subsequent formation of bars need to be distinguished to fully understand the relationship between bars and environment. To this aim we derive the bar fraction in three different environments ranging from the field to Virgo and Coma Clusters, covering an unprecedentedly large range of galaxy luminosities (or, equivalently, stellar masses). We confirm that the fraction of barred galaxies strongly depends on galaxy luminosity. We also show that the difference between the bar fraction distributions as a function of galaxy luminosity (and mass) in the field and Coma Cluster is statistically significant, with Virgo being an intermediate case. The fraction of barred galaxies shows a maximum of about 50% at Mr ≃ − 20.5 in clusters, whereas the peak is shifted to Mr ≃ − 19 in the field. We interpret this result as a variation of the effect of environment on bar formation depending on galaxy luminosity. We speculate that brighter disk galaxies are stable enough against interactions to keep their cold structure, thus, the interactions are able to trigger bar formation. For fainter galaxies, the interactions become strong enough to heat up the disks inhibiting bar formation and even destroying the disks. Finally, we point out that the controversy regarding whether the bar fraction depends on environment could be resolved by taking into account the different luminosity ranges probed by the galaxy samples studied so far.

[1]  B. Moore,et al.  Multi-Wavelength Properties of Barred Galaxies in the Local Universe: Environment and evolution across the Hubble sequence , 2011, 1111.1532.

[2]  Robert C. Nichol,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: the environmental dependence of bars and bulges in disc galaxies , 2011, 1111.0969.

[3]  R. Bender,et al.  A REVISED PARALLEL-SEQUENCE MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES: STRUCTURE AND FORMATION OF S0 AND SPHEROIDAL GALAXIES , 2011, 1110.4384.

[4]  Changbom Park,et al.  DEPENDENCE OF BARRED GALAXY FRACTION ON GALAXY PROPERTIES AND ENVIRONMENT , 2011, 1110.1933.

[5]  H. Muriel,et al.  Relating bars with the environment in the nearby Universe , 2011, 1109.6285.

[6]  J. Conway,et al.  LOFAR and APERTIF Surveys of the Radio Sky: Probing Shocks and Magnetic Fields in Galaxy Clusters , 2011, 1107.1606.

[7]  H. Ferguson,et al.  THE HST/ACS COMA CLUSTER SURVEY. VIII. BARRED DISK GALAXIES IN THE CORE OF THE COMA CLUSTER , 2011, 1201.4910.

[8]  Ewan Cameron,et al.  On the Estimation of Confidence Intervals for Binomial Population Proportions in Astronomy: The Simplicity and Superiority of the Bayesian Approach , 2010, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.

[9]  Marc Huertas-Company,et al.  Revisiting the Hubble sequence in the SDSS DR7 spectroscopic sample: a publicly available Bayesian automated classification , 2010, 1010.3018.

[10]  Y. Wadadekar,et al.  Bar fraction in lenticular galaxies: dependence on luminosity and environment , 2010 .

[11]  J. Aguerri,et al.  Thin discs, thick dwarfs and the effects of stellar feedback , 2010, 1005.4688.

[12]  R. Abraham,et al.  ON THE FRACTION OF BARRED SPIRAL GALAXIES , 2010, 1004.0684.

[13]  Robert C. Nichol,et al.  Galaxy Zoo:bars in disc galaxies , 2010, 1003.0449.

[14]  J. Aguerri,et al.  WHICH GALAXIES HOST BARS AND DISKS? A STUDY OF THE COMA CLUSTER , 2010, 1002.0583.

[15]  D. Thompson,et al.  Bars in early- and late-type discs in COSMOS , 2010, 1001.1736.

[16]  Iap Paris,et al.  Resolved stellar mass maps of galaxies. I: method and implications for global mass estimates , 2009, 0904.4252.

[17]  R. Pelló,et al.  Frequency and properties of bars in cluster and field galaxies at intermediate redshifts , 2009, 0902.4080.

[18]  G. Kauffmann,et al.  The clustering of barred galaxies in the local Universe , 2009, 0902.1175.

[19]  U. L. Laguna,et al.  The population of barred galaxies in the local universe - I. Detection and characterisation of bars , 2009, 0901.2346.

[20]  K. Abazajian,et al.  THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2008, 0812.0649.

[21]  J. Aguerri,et al.  On the origin of dwarf elliptical galaxies: the fundamental plane , 2008, 0811.2228.

[22]  S. Andreon,et al.  Morphology of galaxies in the Coma cluster region down to MB = --14.25 , 2008, 0809.2487.

[23]  S. Okamura,et al.  The Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Coma Cluster Survey. I. Survey Objectives and Design , 2008, 0801.3745.

[24]  O. Fèvre,et al.  A robust morphological classification of high-redshift galaxies using support vector machines on seeing limited images I. Method description , 2007, 0709.1359.

[25]  M. Raddick,et al.  The Fifth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2007, 0707.3380.

[26]  R. Buta,et al.  Properties of Bars and Bulges in the Hubble Sequence , 2007, astro-ph/0702434.

[27]  G. Gavazzi,et al.  Environmental Effects on Late‐Type Galaxies in Nearby Clusters , 2006, astro-ph/0601108.

[28]  E. Athanassoula.  On the nature of bulges in general and of box/peanut bulges in particular: input from N-body simulations , 2005, astro-ph/0502316.

[29]  R. Nichol,et al.  Galaxy ecology: groups and low-density environments in the SDSS and 2dFGRS , 2003, astro-ph/0311379.

[30]  U. Barcelona,et al.  The origin of H I-deficiency in galaxies on the outskirts of the Virgo cluster I. How far can galaxies bounce out of clusters? , 2003, astro-ph/0310709.

[31]  S. Bergh.  Bar Galaxies and Their Environments , 2002, astro-ph/0205354.

[32]  K. Sellgren,et al.  The Frequency of Barred Spiral Galaxies in the Near-Infrared , 1999, astro-ph/9910479.

[33]  M. Noguchi,et al.  Dynamical Properties of Tidally Induced Galactic Bars , 1998 .

[34]  V. Andersen.  The Distribution of Barred Galaxies in the Virgo Cluster , 1996, astro-ph/9603124.

[35]  Matthew C. Dunn.  Structure and dynamics in the Coma cluster. , 1995, astro-ph/9508070.

[36]  P. Monaco,et al.  The local galaxy density and the bars of spiral galaxies , 1993, astro-ph/9303007.

[37]  B. Elmegreen,et al.  Statistical Evidence That Galaxy Companions Trigger Bars and Change the Spiral Hubble Type , 1990 .

[38]  Allan Sandage,et al.  Studies of the Virgo cluster. VI. Morphological and kinematical structure of the Virgo cluster , 1987 .

[39]  Y. Taniguchi,et al.  Disc galaxies and their environments; the relative populations of subclasses of ordinary and barred spiral galaxies in the various environments , 1986 .

[40]  E. Athanassoula,et al.  Bi-symmetric instabilities of the Kuz'min/Toomre disc , 1986 .

[41]  L. Thompson.  Bar instabilities in Coma cluster galaxies , 1981 .

[42]  P. Peebles,et al.  A Numerical Study of the Stability of Flattened Galaxies: or, can Cold Galaxies Survive? , 1973 .

[43]  V. Debattista,et al.  Morphological evolution of discs in clusters , 2005 .

[44]  (DOI: will be inserted by hand later) Properties of Isolated Disk Galaxies , 2004 .

[45]  H. Rix,et al.  Spiral Galaxies in the Near-IR , 1996 .

[46]  Allan Sandage,et al.  The Luminosity Function of Galaxies , 1988 .

[47]  E. Burbidge,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES , 1978 .

[48]  Y. Wadadekar,et al.  Submitted to ApJS Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE SIXTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2022 .