Simulating the mammographic appearance of circumscribed lesions

[1]  C E Metz,et al.  Quantification of failure to demonstrate statistical significance. The usefulness of confidence intervals. , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[2]  L Costaridou,et al.  Quantifying image quality at breast periphery vs mammary gland in mammography using wavelet analysis. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  K Doi,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[4]  M. Kallergi,et al.  Simulation model of mammographic calcifications based on the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, or BIRADS. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[5]  R Di Paola,et al.  A fractal approach to the segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 1995, Medical physics.

[6]  M. Wallis,et al.  Analysis of optical density and contrast in mammograms. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  L Costaridou,et al.  An image visualization tool in mammography. , 1999, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[8]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[10]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  A Quantitative Feature to Aid Diagnosis in Mammography , 1996 .

[11]  L Costaridou,et al.  A tool for designing digital test objects for module performance evaluation in medical digital imaging. , 1999, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Mammographic feature analysis. , 1993, Seminars in roentgenology.

[13]  E Claridge,et al.  Extraction of quantitative blur measures for circumscribed lesions in mammograms. , 1991, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[14]  Jian Fan,et al.  Simulated phantom images for optimizing wavelet-based image processing algorithms in mammography , 1994, Optics & Photonics.

[15]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[16]  R Di Paola,et al.  A simulation model of clustered breast microcalcifications. , 1994, Medical physics.

[17]  P. Pattynama,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology. , 1998, European journal of radiology.

[18]  Michael Brady,et al.  A Representation for Mammographic Image Processing , 1995, CVRMed.

[19]  George Mather,et al.  Irradiation: Implications for theories of edge localization , 1986, Vision Research.

[20]  M Souto,et al.  Real and simulated clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. ROC study of observer performance. , 1997, Medical physics.

[21]  P. Robinson,et al.  Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  M Kallergi,et al.  Evaluating the performance of detection algorithms in digital mammography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[23]  L Costaridou,et al.  Using component technologies for web based wavelet enhanced mammographic image visualization , 2000, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[24]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[25]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Simulating disease in mammography , 2001 .