Guidelines You Can Follow and Can Trust: An Ideal and an Example

Guidelines are popular these days. They are mentioned in journal articles, 1-3 editorials, 4 insurance company contracts, and federal legislation. The Institute of Medicine has dedicated two reports to the subject. 5,6 Unfortunately, the word guideline covers a broad spectrum of intellectual products. Some are hard to follow. They use weasel words instead of numeric thresholds or explicit criteria at their decision points and do not really tell you what to do. We say these are not decidable . Drug package inserts are notorious: "Serum electrolytes (particularly potassium), CO 2 , creatinine and BUN should be determined frequently during the first few months of Lasix therapy and periodically thereafter." 7 Guidelines for isoniazid prophylaxis, in contrast, are explicit and easy to follow. 8 Some are simple, describing the indications for a single action and requiring access to only a few variables for their execution. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines

[1]  C. McDonald Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  C. McDonald,et al.  Action-Orientated Decisions in Ambulatory Medicine , 1981 .

[3]  Jeffrey A. Stem,et al.  A computer-derived protocol to aid in the diagnosis of emergency room patients with acute chest pain. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  G O Barnett,et al.  The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care-unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease. A prospective multicenter clinical trial. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  H. Sox,et al.  Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  I McDowell,et al.  Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.

[8]  A M Epstein,et al.  The outcomes movement--will it get us where we want to go? , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Field,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines : directions for a new program , 1990 .

[10]  R M Gardner,et al.  The impact of the HELP computer system on the LDS Hospital paper medical record. , 1991, Topics in health record management.

[11]  David M. Eddy,et al.  A Manual for Assessing Health Practices & Designing Practice Policies: The Explicit Approach , 1992 .

[12]  M. Field,et al.  Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use , 1992 .

[13]  C. Landefeld,et al.  Guideline-based consultation to prevent anticoagulant-related bleeding. A randomized, controlled trial in a teaching hospital. , 1992, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  S. Woolf Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  T P Clemmer,et al.  A successful computerized protocol for clinical management of pressure control inverse ratio ventilation in ARDS patients. , 1992, Chest.

[16]  J P Kassirer,et al.  The quality of care and the quality of measuring it. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Robert Raschke,et al.  The Weight-based Heparin Dosing Nomogram Compared with a Standard Care Nomogram , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  C. McDonald,et al.  Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. , 1993, JAMA.

[19]  I. Stiell,et al.  Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. , 1994, JAMA.