Fast and consistent estimation of species trees using supermatrix rooted triples.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Kai Lai Chung,et al. A Course in Probability Theory , 1949 .
[2] J. Neyman. MOLECULAR STUDIES OF EVOLUTION: A SOURCE OF NOVEL STATISTICAL PROBLEMS* , 1971 .
[3] Joseph Felsenstein,et al. The number of evolutionary trees , 1978 .
[4] Alfred V. Aho,et al. Inferring a Tree from Lowest Common Ancestors with an Application to the Optimization of Relational Expressions , 1981, SIAM J. Comput..
[5] David S. Johnson,et al. The computational complexity of inferring rooted phylogenies by parsimony , 1986 .
[6] M. Nei. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .
[7] S. Gupta,et al. Statistical decision theory and related topics IV , 1988 .
[8] M. Nei,et al. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.
[9] Michael D. Hendy,et al. A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees , 1989 .
[10] M. Ragan. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. , 1992, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[11] M. Steel. The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees , 1992 .
[12] B. Baum. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees , 1992 .
[13] K. Strimmer,et al. Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum-Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies , 1996 .
[14] W. Maddison. Gene Trees in Species Trees , 1997 .
[15] R. Page,et al. From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[16] Andrew Rambaut,et al. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[17] M. Nei,et al. Relationships between Gene Trees and Species Trees1 , 1998 .
[18] D. Swofford,et al. Taxon sampling revisited , 1999, Nature.
[19] Bin Ma,et al. From Gene Trees to Species Trees , 2000, SIAM J. Comput..
[20] M. P. Cummings,et al. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .
[21] Z. Yang,et al. Complexity of the simplest phylogenetic estimation problem , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[22] Charles Semple,et al. A supertree method for rooted trees , 2000, Discret. Appl. Math..
[23] David Fernández-Baca,et al. Flipping: A supertree construction method , 2001, Bioconsensus.
[24] Sudhir Kumar,et al. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] Thomas H. Cormen,et al. Introduction to algorithms [2nd ed.] , 2001 .
[26] David Bryant,et al. A classification of consensus methods for phylogenetics , 2001, Bioconsensus.
[27] D. Swofford. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .
[28] Derrick J. Zwickl,et al. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. , 2002, Systematic biology.
[29] Roderic D. M. Page,et al. Modified Mincut Supertrees , 2002, WABI.
[30] Ziheng Yang,et al. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. , 2003, Genetics.
[31] S. Carroll,et al. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies , 2003, Nature.
[32] Michael P. Cummings,et al. PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .
[33] Bryan Kolaczkowski,et al. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous , 2004, Nature.
[34] O. Bininda-Emonds,et al. The evolution of supertrees. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[35] Tamir Tuller,et al. Maximum likelihood of evolutionary trees: hardness and approximation , 2005, ISMB.
[36] Scott V Edwards,et al. SPECIATIONAL HISTORY OF AUSTRALIAN GRASS FINCHES (POEPHILA) INFERRED FROM THIRTY GENE TREES* , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[37] GENE TREE DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE COALESCENT PROCESS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[38] Sudhindra R Gadagkar,et al. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. , 2005, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.
[39] R. Baker,et al. Hidden likelihood support in genomic data: can forty-five wrongs make a right? , 2005, Systematic biology.
[40] S. Carroll,et al. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[41] Eric Vigoda,et al. Phylogenetic MCMC Algorithms Are Misleading on Mixtures of Trees , 2005, Science.
[42] Discordance of Species Trees with Their Most Likely Gene Trees , 2006, PLoS genetics.
[43] D. Hillis,et al. Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling. , 2006, Systematic biology.
[44] Sébastien Roch,et al. A short proof that phylogenetic tree reconstruction by maximum likelihood is hard , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.
[45] C. Simon,et al. Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). , 2006, Systematic biology.
[46] Sagi Snir,et al. Maximum likelihood Jukes-Cantor triplets: analytic solutions. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[47] D. Pearl,et al. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[48] Noah A. Rosenberg,et al. Counting Coalescent Histories , 2007, J. Comput. Biol..
[49] J. Gatesy,et al. The supermatrix approach to systematics. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[50] L. Kubatko,et al. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[51] Luay Nakhleh,et al. Confounding Factors in HGT Detection: Statistical Error, Coalescent Effects, and Multiple Solutions , 2007, J. Comput. Biol..
[52] Vincent Moulton,et al. Using supernetworks to distinguish hybridization from lineage-sorting , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[53] D. Pearl,et al. High-resolution species trees without concatenation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[54] Ingo Ebersberger,et al. Rooted triple consensus and anomalous gene trees , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[55] B. Larget,et al. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[56] Michael D. Hendy,et al. Analytic solutions for three taxon ML trees with variable rates across sites , 2007, Discret. Appl. Math..
[57] Montgomery Slatkin,et al. Subdivision in an ancestral species creates asymmetry in gene trees. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.
[58] Noah A Rosenberg,et al. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees: the case of five taxa. , 2008, Systematic biology.
[59] Mike Steel,et al. Maximum likelihood supertrees. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[60] Liang Liu,et al. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model , 2008, Bioinform..
[61] Laura Salter Kubatko,et al. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.
[62] S. Edwards. IS A NEW AND GENERAL THEORY OF MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS EMERGING? , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[63] S. Edwards,et al. Phylogenetic analysis in the anomaly zone. , 2009, Systematic biology.
[64] S. J. Willson. Robustness of Topological Supertree Methods for Reconciling Dense Incompatible Data , 2009, TCBB.
[65] Noah A Rosenberg,et al. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[66] David Bryant,et al. Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees. , 2008, Systematic biology.