Psychosocial effects of abnormal Pap tests and mammograms: A review

ABSTRACT This article presents a review of the psychosocial consequences of abnormal Pap tests and mammograms. Published articles related to the effects of abnormal Pap tests and mammograms were identified by MEDLINE search. Studies related to the communication of test results, the consequences of an abnormal test result, and the role of health care providers emerged as relevant areas. The communication of abnormal test results is done using a variety of methods. Both physician and patient characteristics can hinder proper communication. Abnormal Pap tests and mammograms can cause anxiety, fear, depression, and failure to comply with treatment and future routine screening tests. Health care providers are the focal point for motivating patients to return for treatment and screening. Tracking and reminder systems can facilitate providers' efforts to improve compliance. Several techniques can be used by providers to improve the notification process and reduce the negative psychosocial effects of abnormal Pap...

[1]  D. Stewart,et al.  The Effect of Educational Brochures on Follow‐Up Compliance in Women With Abnormal Papanicolaou Smears , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  B. Rimer,et al.  Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: is it effective? , 1994, American journal of public health.

[3]  L. Lacey,et al.  Referral adherence in an inner city breast and cervical cancer screening program , 1993, Cancer.

[4]  D. Gjerdingen,et al.  Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women of different races. , 1993, The Journal of family practice.

[5]  R B Haynes,et al.  An overview of interventions to improve compliance with appointment keeping for medical services. , 1992, JAMA.

[6]  J. Berek,et al.  Improving Adherence to Screening Follow-Up Among Women with Abnormal Pap Smears: Results from a Large Clinic-Based Trial of Three Intervention Strategies , 1992, Medical care.

[7]  P. DePriest.  Transvaginal Ultrasound Screening for Ovarian Cancer , 1992, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  M. Quinn,et al.  A Study of Women Who Appear to Default from Management of an Abnormal Pap Smear , 1992, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[9]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Telephone counseling improves adherence to colposcopy among lower-income minority women. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  D. Shapiro,et al.  The effect of varied physician affect on recall, anxiety, and perceptions in women at risk for breast cancer: an analogue study. , 1992, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[11]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  Rate of compliance with recommendations for additional mammographic views and biopsies. , 1991, Radiology.

[12]  S. Nolte,et al.  Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  W. Catalona,et al.  Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  B. Trock,et al.  Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  A M Epstein,et al.  Delayed access to health care: risk factors, reasons, and consequences. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[17]  B. Trock,et al.  Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. , 1991, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[18]  M A Helvie,et al.  Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. , 1991, Radiology.

[19]  E. Paskett,et al.  Improving follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a randomized controlled trial. , 1990, Preventive medicine.

[20]  B. Foster,et al.  Psychodynamics of late diagnosis cancer patients: a model for understanding screening failure. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  E. Paskett,et al.  Compliance Behavior in Women With Abnormal Pap Smears: Developing and Testing a Decision Model , 1990, Medical care.

[22]  R. Warnecke,et al.  Results of an intervention to improve compliance with referrals for evaluation of suspected malignancies at neighborhood public health centers. , 1990, American journal of public health.

[23]  S. Moss,et al.  Psychiatric morbidity associated with screening for breast cancer. , 1989, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  J. Neutens,et al.  Impact of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis and treatment on self-esteem and body image. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[25]  D. Kopans,et al.  Communication problems after mammographic screening. , 1989, Radiology.

[26]  I McDowell,et al.  Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.

[27]  I McDowell,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Computerized Reminders for Blood Pressure Screening in Primary Care , 1989, Medical care.

[28]  J. Robertson,et al.  Risk of cervical cancer associated with mild dyskaryosis. , 1988, BMJ.

[29]  I. Fentiman,et al.  PENSIVE WOMEN, PAINFUL VIGILS: CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY IN ASSESSMENT OF MAMMOGRAPHIC ABNORMALITIES , 1988, The Lancet.

[30]  R. Pagano,et al.  The Natural History of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Atypia of the Cervix , 1987, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[31]  Jersey Liang,et al.  The early detection of cancer in the primary-care setting: factors associated with the acceptance and completion of recommended procedures. , 1987, Preventive medicine.

[32]  A. Singer.  The abnormal cervical smear. , 1986, British medical journal.

[33]  L. Frisch.  Effectiveness of a case management protocol in improving follow-up and referral of Papanicolaou smears indicating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1986, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[34]  W. P. Soutter,et al.  Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy? , 1986, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[35]  P. Gervaize,et al.  The Emotional Impact of Abnormal Pap Smears on Patients Referred for Colposcopy , 1986 .

[36]  F. Judson,et al.  Cost‐yield of Routine Papanicolaou Smear Screening in a Clinic for Sexually Transmitted Diseases , 1985, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[37]  R. Michielutte,et al.  Noncompliance in screening follow-up among family planning clinic patients with cervical dysplasia. , 1985, Preventive medicine.

[38]  J. Schuurman,et al.  Psychological side-effects of the mass screening on cervical cancer. , 1984, Social science & medicine.

[39]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. , 1982, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[40]  A. Ferenczy,et al.  An analysis of "long-term" follow-up results in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by cryotherapy. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[41]  R B Haynes,et al.  Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  Hirsh Hl.  The pitfalls and perils of countersuits. , 1977 .

[43]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial , 1977, Cancer.

[44]  D. Shepard,et al.  Mailed versus telephoned appointment reminders to reduce broken appointments in a hospital outpatient department. , 1976, Medical care.

[45]  B. Hsi,et al.  Estimating a patient's cooperation with his regimen , 1971, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[46]  C. Redmond,et al.  FACTORS RELATED TO PROGRESSION OF CERVICAL ATYPIAS , 1971 .

[47]  C. Carter.  II.—CHROMOSOMES AND CHROMOSOME MUTATIONS , 1969 .