How effector-specific is the effect of sequence learning by motor execution and motor imagery?

The aim of the present study was twofold. First, we wanted to examine how effector specific the effect of sequence learning by motor execution is, and second, we wanted to compare this effect with learning by motor imagery. We employed a Go/NoGo discrete sequence production task in which in each trial a spatial sequence of five stimuli was presented. After a Go signal the corresponding spatial response sequence had to be executed, while after a NoGo signal, the response sequence had to be mentally imagined. For the training phase, participants were divided into two groups. In the index finger group, participants had to respond (physically or mentally) with the left or right index finger, while in the hand group they had to respond with four fingers of the left or right hand. In a final test phase both execution modes were compared and all trials had to be executed. Response times and the percentage of correct responses were determined to establish learning effects. Results showed that sequence learning effects as assessed in the test phase were independent of the effector used during the training phase. Results revealed the presence of aspecific learning effects in the case of learning a required motor task with an index finger, but sequence-specific learning effects, both due to motor execution and to motor imagery, were not effector specific.

[1]  D. Landers,et al.  The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. , 1983 .

[2]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice , 2006, Neuroscience.

[3]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  E. Kleine,et al.  Decreased load on general motor preparation and visual-working memory while preparing familiar as compared to unfamiliar movement sequences , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  Ursula Debarnot,et al.  Variable motor imagery training induces sleep memory consolidation and transfer improvements , 2015, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[6]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The timing of mentally represented actions , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Context dependent learning in the serial RT task , 2007, Psychological research.

[9]  Willem B Verwey,et al.  Contributions from associative and explicit sequence knowledge to the execution of discrete keying sequences. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[10]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[11]  Wojciech Jaśkowski,et al.  The influence of motor imagery on the learning of a sequential motor skill , 2015 .

[12]  W B Verwey,et al.  Concatenating familiar movement sequences: the versatile cognitive processor. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[13]  K. Doya,et al.  Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  V. G. Payne,et al.  Human Motor Development: A Lifespan Approach , 1987 .

[15]  Wojciech Jaśkowski,et al.  To What Extent Can Motor Imagery Replace Motor Execution While Learning a Fine Motor Skill? , 2016, Advances in Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Effect of Practice on Effector Independence , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  D. Landers,et al.  Physical Practice is Superior to Mental Practice In Enhancing Cognitive and Motor Task Performance , 1991 .

[18]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  Motor learning without doing: trial-by-trial improvement in motor performance during mental training. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  L. Xu,et al.  Motor execution and motor imagery: A comparison of functional connectivity patterns based on graph theory , 2014, Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Annett A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[21]  A. Uitterlinden,et al.  BMI-Associated Alleles Do Not Constitute Risk Alleles for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Independently of BMI: A Case-Control Study , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  David A. Caulton,et al.  On the Modularity of Sequence Representation , 1995 .

[23]  William M. Land,et al.  Mental Representation and Mental Practice: Experimental Investigation on the Functional Links between Motor Memory and Motor Imagery , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  N. Rinehart,et al.  Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: evidence against a global “mirror system” deficit , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  L. Rehbein,et al.  Motor imagery as a tool for motor skill training in children , 2015 .

[26]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Central mechanisms of motor skill learning , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  Sreeram V Ramagopalan,et al.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in people admitted to hospital with selected immune-mediated diseases: record-linkage study , 2011, BMC medicine.

[28]  R. Gentili,et al.  Laterality effects in motor learning by mental practice in right-handers , 2015, Neuroscience.

[29]  Andrea Brovelli,et al.  Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Stefan Panzer,et al.  The Coding and Inter-Manual Transfer of Movement Sequences , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[31]  H. Nakata,et al.  Effector-independent brain activity during motor imagery of the upper and lower limbs: An fMRI study , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  David L Wright,et al.  Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task , 2004, Psychological research.

[33]  C. Schuster,et al.  Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines , 2011, BMC medicine.

[34]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[35]  Alexander M. Harner,et al.  Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  Evidence for a multistage model of practice in a sequential movement task. , 1999 .

[37]  Benjamin A Clegg,et al.  Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task , 2005, Psychological research.

[38]  Geoffrey Bird,et al.  Action observation supports effector-dependent learning of finger movement sequences , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Wojciech Jaśkowski,et al.  The influence of motor imagery on the learning of a fine hand motor skill , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Eduard C. Groen,et al.  The stuff that motor chunks are made of: Spatial instead of motor representations? , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  Charles H Shea,et al.  The coding and effector transfer of movement sequences. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Context-dependent motor skill and the role of practice , 2011, Psychological research.

[43]  C. Buss,et al.  Children's Brain Development Benefits from Longer Gestation , 2011, Front. Psychology.