The three economic values of cultural heritage: a case study in the Netherlands
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] I. Bateman,et al. Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method , 1997 .
[2] R. Mason. Conference report. Economics and heritage conservation: concepts, values, and agendas for research, Getty conservation institute, Los Angeles (December 8-11, 1998) , 1999, International Journal of Cultural Property.
[3] Laura O. Taylor. The Hedonic Method , 2003 .
[4] I. Bateman,et al. The Axford Debate Revisited: A Case Study Illustrating Different Approaches to the Aggregation of Benefits Data , 2000 .
[5] R. Brouwer,et al. Contingent valuation of the public benefits of agricultural wildlife management: the case of Dutch peat meadow land. , 1998 .
[6] J. F. Coeterier,et al. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape , 1996 .
[7] L. Hitchens. Ståle Navrud and Richard C. Ready (eds.): 2002, Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts , 2003 .
[8] Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .
[9] I. Bateman. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport , 2002 .
[10] Ståle Navrud,et al. Valuing cultural heritage: applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. , 2002 .
[11] N. Hanley,et al. Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment , 1994 .