Standardizing and Optimizing the Use of Accelerometer Data for Free-Living Physical Activity Monitoring

The unequivocal link between physical activity and health has prompted researchers and public health officials to search for valid, reliable, and logistically feasible tools to measure and quantify free-living physical activity. Accelerometers hold promise in this regard. Recent technological advances have led to decreases in both the size and cost of accelerometers while increasing functionality (e.g., greater memory, waterproofing). A lack of common data reduction and standardized reporting procedures dramatically limit their potential, however. The purpose of this article is to expand on the utility of accelerometers for measuring free-living physical activity. A detailed example profile of physical activity is presented to highlight the potential richness of accelerometer data. Specific recommendations for optimizing and standardizing the use of accelerometer data are provided with support from specific examples. This descriptive article is intended to advance and ignite scholarly dialogue and debate ...

[1]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Assessing Physical Activity Among Children With Accelerometers Using Different Time Sampling Intervals and Placements , 2002 .

[2]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  R H DuRant,et al.  Physical activity epidemiology applied to children and adolescents. , 1998, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[4]  K R Westerterp,et al.  Assessment of energy expenditure by recording heart rate and body acceleration. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  C B Corbin,et al.  Restricting Opportunities to Be Active during School Time: Do Children Compensate by Increasing Physical Activity Levels after School? , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[6]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  J. Sallis Measuring Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure , 1996 .

[9]  J. Witt,et al.  The stability of children's physical activity as measured by accelerometry and self-report. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  D R Bassett,et al.  Comparison of MTI Accelerometer Cut-Points for Predicting Time Spent in Physical Activity , 2003, International journal of sports medicine.

[11]  P S Freedson,et al.  Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. physical activity monitor. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Erica Frank,et al.  Physical Activity and Nutrition in Children and Youth: An Overview of Obesity Prevention☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[13]  P S Freedson,et al.  Objective Monitoring of Physical Activity Using Motion Sensors and Heart Rate , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[14]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Young and active? Young people and health-enhancing physical activity - evidence and implications , 1998 .

[15]  Robert Williams,et al.  Fully proportional actigraphy: A new instrument , 1996 .

[16]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  A. Luke,et al.  Simultaneous monitoring of heart rate and motion to assess energy expenditure. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  S. Trost,et al.  Physical activity and determinants of physical activity in obese and non-obese children , 2001, International Journal of Obesity.

[19]  M. Puyau,et al.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. , 2002, Obesity research.

[20]  L. Mccargar,et al.  Childhood obesity in Canada: a review of prevalence estimates and risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes. , 2003, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[21]  J F Sallis,et al.  Predictors of adoption and maintenance of vigorous physical activity in men and women. , 1992, Preventive medicine.

[22]  P. Freedson,et al.  Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  J. Curnow,et al.  Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  E L Melanson,et al.  Overview of the determinants of overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  P. D. Watson,et al.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  M. Hovell,et al.  Determinants of Exercise Behavior , 1990, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[27]  David R Bassett,et al.  Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  Gregory J. Welk,et al.  Physical Activity Assessments for Health-Related Research , 2002 .

[29]  J. Sallis,et al.  The Caltrac accelerometer as a physical activity monitor for school-age children. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[30]  James O. Hill,et al.  Obesity and the Environment: Where Do We Go from Here? , 2003, Science.

[31]  Tim Olds,et al.  One Hundred Years of Growth: The Evolution of Height, Mass, and Body Composition in Australian Children, 1899-1999 , 2001, Human biology.

[32]  A. Astrup,et al.  Obesity : Preventing and managing the global epidemic , 2000 .