Optimal allocation of static VAR compensator by a hybrid algorithm

Flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) devices are gaining popularity in electrical transmission networks for the last few years due to their ability to improve a system’s performance without restructuring or expanding the existing network. But, placing the FACTS device at any arbitrary location in the network may not be optimally beneficial. Also, judging the optimally beneficial location of these devices becomes necessary prior to investment owing to their high expense of installation and maintenance. In this paper, a novel hybrid algorithm combining Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA) and Chemical Reaction Optimization (CRO) is proposed to solve the problem of optimally allocating a static VAR compensator (SVC) for the standard IEEE 14-bus, 30-bus and 57-bus transmission systems under heavily loaded condition. The optimal allocation of SVC is done by considering technical aspects like voltage stability, power generation minimization and line loss reduction and also by considering commercial facets like savings on annual cost of power generation and return-on-investment (ROI) time period for the expenditure incurred on the SVC. The ROI calculation is a novel addition to the problem formulation which adds a practical outlook to the feasibility of investment. Thus, a holistic approach is followed for determining the optimal location of the SVC in the power network and the results validate the superior performance of the proposed algorithm.

[1]  Steffen Rebennack,et al.  Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey II , 2012, Energy Systems.

[2]  Victor O. K. Li,et al.  Chemical-Reaction-Inspired Metaheuristic for Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[3]  Binod Shaw,et al.  Solution of Optimal Power Flow with FACTS Devices Using Opposition-Based Gravitational Search Algorithm , 2014, SEMCCO.

[4]  Jovica V. Milanovic,et al.  Assessment of techno-economic contribution of FACTS devices to power system operation , 2010 .

[5]  A. Rezaee Jordehi,et al.  Enhanced leader PSO (ELPSO): A new algorithm for allocating distributed TCSC's in power systems , 2015 .

[6]  Subhransu Sekhar Dash,et al.  Simulation technique for voltage stability Analysis and contingency ranking in power systems , 2009 .

[7]  Provas Kumar Roy,et al.  Optimal location of UPFC controller in transmission network using hybrid chemical reaction optimization algorithm , 2015 .

[8]  Belkacem Mahdad,et al.  Optimal location and control of combined SVC–TCSC controller to enhance power system loadability , 2014, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[9]  Sujatha Peddakotla,et al.  A Modified Cuckoo Search Algorithm for Improving Voltage Profile and to Diminish Power Losses by Locating Multi-type FACTS Devices , 2016 .

[10]  Chao Duan,et al.  FACTS Devices Allocation via Sparse Optimization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Victor O. K. Li,et al.  Real-Coded Chemical Reaction Optimization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  A. Kazemi,et al.  Multiobjective Optimal Location of FACTS Shunt-Series Controllers for Power System Operation Planning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  R. C. Desai,et al.  Modern power system analysis , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Innocent Kamwa,et al.  Optimal placement of multiple-type FACTS devices to maximize power system loadability using a generic graphical user interface , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Biplab Bhattacharyya,et al.  Fuzzy based evolutionary algorithm for reactive power optimization with FACTS devices , 2014 .

[16]  Yao Jian-gang,et al.  Application of min cut algorithm for optimal location of FACTS devices considering system loadability and cost of installation , 2014 .

[17]  Parimal Acharjee,et al.  Hybridization of cuckoo search algorithm and chemical reaction optimization for economic load dispatch problem , 2016, 2016 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE).

[18]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Cuckoo Search via Lévy flights , 2009, 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC).

[19]  Steffen Rebennack,et al.  An introduction to optimal power flow: Theory, formulation, and examples , 2016 .

[20]  Parimal Acharjee,et al.  Voltage Profile Improvement and loss reduction using optimal allocation of SVC , 2015, 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON).

[21]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems , 1999 .

[22]  Kedar Nath Das,et al.  DPD: An intelligent parallel hybrid algorithm for economic load dispatch problems with various practical constraints , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Seyed Abbas Taher,et al.  New approach for optimal UPFC placement using hybrid immune algorithm in electric power systems , 2012 .

[24]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  Solution of optimal reactive power dispatch of power systems using hybrid particle swarm optimization and imperialist competitive algorithms , 2016 .

[25]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  Power flow control and power flow studies for systems with FACTS devices , 1998 .

[26]  Vivekananda Mukherjee,et al.  A novel symbiotic organisms search algorithm for optimal power flow of power system with FACTS devices , 2016 .

[27]  Steffen Rebennack,et al.  Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey I , 2012, Energy Systems.

[28]  A. Rezaee Jordehi,et al.  Brainstorm optimisation algorithm (BSOA): An efficient algorithm for finding optimal location and setting of FACTS devices in electric power systems , 2015 .

[29]  Hussain Shareef,et al.  Optimal design of damping controllers using a new hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm , 2013 .

[30]  F. Z. Gherbi,et al.  The combined economic environmental dispatch using new hybrid metaheuristic , 2016 .