Co-adaptive calibration to improve BCI efficiency

All brain-computer interface (BCI) groups that have published results of studies involving a large number of users performing BCI control based on the voluntary modulation of sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) report that BCI control could not be achieved by a non-negligible number of subjects (estimated 20% to 25%). This failure of the BCI system to read the intention of the user is one of the greatest problems and challenges in BCI research. There are two main causes for this problem in SMR-based BCI systems: either no idle SMR is observed over motor areas of the user, or this idle rhythm is not modulated during motor imagery, resulting in a classification performance lower than 70% (criterion level) that renders the control of a BCI application (like a speller) difficult or impossible. Previously, we introduced the concept of machine learning based co-adaptive calibration, which provided substantially improved performance for a variety of users. Here, we use a similar approach and investigate to what extent co-adaptive learning enables significant BCI control for completely novice users, as well as for those who could not achieve control with a conventional SMR-based BCI.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  B. Allison,et al.  BCI Demographics: How Many (and What Kinds of) People Can Use an SSVEP BCI? , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Towards adaptive classification for BCI , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine-Learning-Based Coadaptive Calibration for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2011, Neural Computation.

[5]  J. Blumberg,et al.  Adaptive Classification for Brain Computer Interfaces , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  T. N. Lal,et al.  Classifying EEG and ECoG signals without subject training for fast BCI implementation: comparison of nonparalyzed and completely paralyzed subjects , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Evaluation of the Bremen SSVEP based BCI in real world conditions , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[8]  José del R. Millán,et al.  An Introduction to Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2007 .

[9]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Implementation of a Brain-Computer Interface Based on Three States of Motor Imagery , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[11]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Covariate Shift Adaptation by Importance Weighted Cross Validation , 2007, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Noninvasive brain-actuated control of a mobile robot by human EEG , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Unsupervised Brain Computer Interface Based on Intersubject Information and Online Adaptation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  K. Müller,et al.  Finding stationary subspaces in multivariate time series. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[17]  E. Sellers,et al.  How many people are able to control a P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  Christa Neuper,et al.  14 Human Brain-Computer Interface , 2005 .

[19]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[20]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  An Extended EM Algorithm for Joint Feature Extraction and Classification in Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2006, Neural Computation.

[21]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  A fully on-line adaptive BCI , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  A. Buttfield,et al.  Towards a robust BCI: error potentials and online learning , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Predictability of Brain-Computer Communication , 2004 .

[25]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Accurate performance from first-session in BCI-naive subjects , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  K. Jellinger Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2009 .

[27]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Brain-actuated interaction , 2004, Artif. Intell..

[28]  Jan Pieter van Oudenhoven,et al.  The effects of contingent feedback on perceived control and performance , 1995 .

[29]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Toward Unsupervised Adaptation of LDA for Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.