Experimental study of the semi‐active control of building structures using the shaking table

A magnetorheological (MR) damper has been manufactured and tested and a non-linear model is discussed. The parameters for the model are identified from an identification set of experimental data; these parameters are then used to reconstruct the force vs. displacement and the force vs. velocity hysteresis cycles of the MR damper for the hysteretic model. Then experiments are conducted on a three-storey frame model using impact excitation, which identifies dynamic parameters of the model equipped with and without the MR damper. Natural frequencies, damping ratios and mode shapes, as well as structural properties, such as the mass, stiffness and damping matrices, are obtained. A semi-active control method such as a variable structure controller is studied. Based on the ‘reaching law’ method, a feedback controller is presented. In order to evaluate the efficiency of the control system and the effect of earthquake ground motions, both numerical analysis and shaking table tests of the model, with and without the MR damper, have been carried out under three different ground motions: El Centro 1940, Taft 1952, and Ninghe 1976 (Tangshan Earthquake in Chinese). It is found from both the numerical analysis and the shaking table tests that the maximum accelerations and relative displacements for all floors are significantly reduced with the MR damper. A reasonable agreement between the results obtained from the numerical analysis and those from the shaking table tests is also observed. On the other hand, tests conducted at different earthquake excitations and various excitation levels demonstrate the ability of the MR damper to surpass the performance of a comparable passive system in a variety of situations. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  José A. Inaudi,et al.  Modulated homogeneous friction : A semi-active damping strategy , 1997 .

[2]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection , 1998 .

[3]  J. L. Sproston,et al.  Applications of electro-rheological fluids in vibration control: a survey , 1996 .

[4]  J. David Carlson,et al.  A growing attraction to magnetic fluids , 1994 .

[5]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[6]  D. J. Shippy,et al.  BEM treatment of body forces in plane orthotropic elastostatics , 1995 .

[7]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[8]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  Closed loop structural control using electrorheological dampers , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[9]  T. T. Soong,et al.  STRUCTURAL CONTROL: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 1997 .

[10]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review , 1999 .

[11]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  On the current status of magnetorheological dampers: seismic protection of full-scale structures , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[12]  S.J. Dyke,et al.  A comparison of semi-active control strategies for the MR damper , 1997, Proceedings Intelligent Information Systems. IIS'97.

[13]  George Leitmann,et al.  Semiactive Control for Vibration Attenuation , 1994 .

[14]  Weibing Gao,et al.  Discrete-time variable structure control systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[15]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS , 1997 .

[16]  J. D. Carlson,et al.  COMMERCIAL MAGNETO-RHEOLOGICAL FLUID DEVICES , 1996 .