Informed consent for colonoscopy. A prospective study.

Central to the nature of the physician-patient relationship is how fully patients are informed about their disease and prognosis and how active a role they take in deciding treatment; the "autonomy" and "paternalistic" models represent current poles of physician behavior. While informed consent has become ubiquitous in medical practice, it is not clear to what extent the value of patient autonomy has entered into everyday medical decisions. To evaluate informed consent, we prospectively surveyed 102 outpatients scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy and 16 of their physicians. The colonoscopy examination is straightforward and offers an optimal opportunity for patient participation in decision making. We found that most patients wanted guidance from their physicians and most physicians did not view the patient as autonomous. The more traditional parentalistic model continues to influence the physician-patient relationship, at least for this technical endeavor.

[1]  B. Lo,et al.  Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? , 1984, JAMA.

[2]  D. Callahan Autonomy: a moral good, not a moral obsession. , 1984, The Hastings Center report.

[3]  J. Holland,et al.  Informed consent for investigational chemotherapy: patients' and physicians' perceptions. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  W. White Informed consent: ambiguity in theory and practice. , 1983, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[5]  A. Faden,et al.  Disclosure of Information to Patients in Medical Care , 1981, Medical care.

[6]  B. Cassileth,et al.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. , 1980, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  R. Sherlock Reasonable men and sick human beings. , 1986, The American journal of medicine.