Multivariate adaptive regression splines for analysis of geotechnical engineering systems

With the rapid increases in processing speed and memory of low-cost computers, it is not surprising that various advanced computational learning tools such as neural networks have been increasingly used for analyzing or modeling highly nonlinear multivariate engineering problems. These algorithms are useful for analyzing many geotechnical problems, particularly those that lack a precise analytical theory or understanding of the phenomena involved. In situations where measured or numerical data are available, neural networks have been shown to offer great promise for mapping the nonlinear interactions (dependency) between the system’s inputs and outputs. Unlike most computational tools, in neural networks no predefined mathematical relationship between the dependent and independent variables is required. However, neural networks have been criticized for its long training process since the optimal configuration is not known a priori. This paper explores the use of a fairly simple nonparametric regression algorithm known as multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) which has the ability to approximate the relationship between the inputs and outputs, and express the relationship mathematically. The main advantages of MARS are its capacity to produce simple, easy-to-interpret models, its ability to estimate the contributions of the input variables, and its computational efficiency. First the MARS algorithm is described. A number of examples are then presented that explore the generalization capabilities and accuracy of this approach in comparison to the back-propagation neural network algorithm.

[1]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  State of the Art of Artificial Neural Networks in Geotechnical Engineering , 2008 .

[2]  Nii O. Attoh-Okine,et al.  Multivariate adaptive regression (MARS) and hinged hyperplanes (HHP) for doweled pavement performance modeling , 2009 .

[3]  Pijush Samui,et al.  Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline and Least Square Support Vector Machine for Prediction of Undrained Shear Strength of Clay , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Metaheuristic Comput..

[4]  Feng. Xuan,et al.  Behavior of diaphragm walls in clays and reliablity analysis , 2009 .

[5]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[6]  F. H. Kulhawy,et al.  Case history evaluation of the behavior of drilled shafts under axial and lateral loading. Final report , 1994 .

[7]  Robert M. Semple,et al.  Shaft Capacity of Driven Pipe Piles in Clay , 1984 .

[8]  C. H. Juang,et al.  Reliability-based method for assessing liquefaction potential of soils , 1999 .

[9]  Anthony T. C. Goh,et al.  Probabilistic neural network for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential , 2002 .

[10]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[11]  G. Wayne Clough,et al.  PREDICTION OF MOVEMENTS FOR BRACED CUTS IN CLAY , 1981 .

[12]  G. Habibagahi,et al.  PREDICTION OF COLLAPSE POTENTIAL FOR COMPACTED SOILS USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS , 2004 .

[13]  Ali Lashkari,et al.  Prediction of the shaft resistance of nondisplacement piles in sand , 2013 .

[14]  A. M. Hefney,et al.  Reliability assessment of EPB tunnel-related settlement , 2010 .

[15]  C. G. Chua,et al.  Bayesian Neural Network Analysis of Undrained Side Resistance of Drilled Shafts , 2005 .

[16]  Fred H. Kulhawy,et al.  Some Observations on Undrained Side Resistance of Drilled Shafts , 1989 .

[17]  Amir Hossein Gandomi,et al.  Permanent deformation analysis of asphalt mixtures using soft computing techniques , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Robert V. Whitman,et al.  Regression Models For Evaluating Liquefaction Probability , 1988 .

[19]  Pijush Samui,et al.  Determination of ultimate capacity of driven piles in cohesionless soil: A Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline approach , 2012 .

[20]  J. Freidman,et al.  Multivariate adaptive regression splines , 1991 .

[21]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Shaft Capacity of Driven Piles in Clay , 1985 .

[22]  Murat Türköz,et al.  Soil liquefaction potential in Eskişehir, NW Turkey , 2011 .

[23]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[24]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Comparison of numerical and analytical solutions for reinforced soil wall shaking table tests , 2011 .

[25]  Ming-Jyh Hsieh,et al.  Discriminant model for evaluating soil liquefaction potential using cone penetration test data , 2004 .

[26]  JongKoo Jeon,et al.  Fuzzy Neural Network Models for Geotechnical Problems , 2008 .