Detection of influenza by real time RT‐PCR is not affected by delays in respiratory specimen processing

Sample processing for real‐time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT‐PCR) based diagnostic assays requires stabilizing sample ribonucleic acid (RNA) in lysis buffer prior to testing. The stability of viral RNA prior to processing is difficult to assure. It is unknown whether clinical sample integrity is compromised by delays in processing, as may occur due to weekends and holidays. We sought to examine the integrity of respiratory specimens with variable processing times. Upper respiratory specimens were collected during three influenza seasons 2009–2012 and tested for influenza virus and internal control human RNase P (RNP) RNA by rRT‐PCR. Time to processing was measured in hours from specimen collection to placement in lysis buffer. Six hundred thirty‐five (11.4%) of 5,583 samples were influenza positive. Mean and median times to processing were 11.5 hr and 6.0 hr, respectively (min 0.1 hr, max 105.2 hr). There were no significant associations between time to processing and presence of RNP (OR = 1.0, P = 0.740), or detection of influenza (OR = 1.0, P = 0.060). Longer duration of illness was associated with a lower likelihood of influenza detection (OR = 0.92, P < 0.001) and with increased influenza A cycle threshold (Ct) values (P < 0.001), while older age was associated with increased influenza B Ct values (P = 0.001), indicating the presence of less amplifiable RNA. Delays in time to processing of upper respiratory specimens up to 105 hr were not associated with decreased detection of amplifiable RNA, suggesting specimen integrity is not compromised by such delays. J. Med. Virol. 88:1891–1895, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  D. Feikin,et al.  Does the length of specimen storage affect influenza testing results by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction? an analysis of influenza surveillance specimens, 2008 to 2010. , 2014, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[2]  J. Gelb,et al.  Optimal specimen collection and transport methods for the detection of avian influenza virus and Newcastle disease virus , 2013, BMC Veterinary Research.

[3]  Edward A Belongia,et al.  Comparison of Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Influenza Detection in Adults , 2012, Clinical Medicine & Research.

[4]  J. Druce,et al.  Evaluation of Swabs, Transport Media, and Specimen Transport Conditions for Optimal Detection of Viruses by PCR , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[5]  Qingxia Chen,et al.  Effectiveness of seasonal vaccine in preventing confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations in community dwelling older adults. , 2011, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  P. Bakke,et al.  Swabbing for respiratory viral infections in older patients: a comparison of rayon and nylon flocked swabs , 2010, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[7]  S. Corden,et al.  Dry cotton or flocked respiratory swabs as a simple collection technique for the molecular detection of respiratory viruses using real-time NASBA. , 2008, Journal of virological methods.

[8]  M. Hindiyeh,et al.  Comparison between Pernasal Flocked Swabs and Nasopharyngeal Aspirates for Detection of Common Respiratory Viruses in Samples from Children , 2008, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.