Dental enamel defect diagnosis through different technology-based devices.

INTRODUCTION Dental enamel defects (DEDs) are faulty or deficient enamel formations of primary and permanent teeth. Changes during tooth development result in hypoplasia (a quantitative defect) and/or hypomineralisation (a qualitative defect). OBJECTIVE To compare technology-based diagnostic methods for detecting DEDs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two-hundred and nine dental surfaces of anterior permanent teeth were selected in patients, 6-11 years of age, with cleft lip with/without cleft palate. First, a conventional clinical examination was conducted according to the modified Developmental Defects of Enamel Index (DDE Index). Dental surfaces were evaluated using an operating microscope and a fluorescence-based device. Interexaminer reproducibility was determined using the kappa test. To compare groups, McNemar's test was used. Cramer's V test was used for comparing the distribution of index codes obtained after classification of all dental surfaces. RESULTS Cramer's V test revealed statistically significant differences (P < .0001) in the distribution of index codes obtained using the different methods; the coefficients were 0.365 for conventional clinical examination versus fluorescence, 0.961 for conventional clinical examination versus operating microscope and 0.358 for operating microscope versus fluorescence. The sensitivity of the operating microscope and fluorescence method was statistically significant (P = .008 and P < .0001, respectively). Otherwise, the results did not show statistically significant differences in accuracy and specificity for either the operating microscope or the fluorescence methods. CONCLUSION This study suggests that the operating microscope performed better than the fluorescence-based device and could be an auxiliary method for the detection of DEDs.

[1]  D. Rios,et al.  Do technology-based devices improve carious lesion detection? , 2016 .

[2]  C. Deery,et al.  Visual Inspection for Caries Detection , 2015, Journal of dental research.

[3]  C. Deery,et al.  Clinical Relevance of Studies on the Accuracy of Visual Inspection for Detecting Caries Lesions: A Systematic Review , 2015, Caries Research.

[4]  S. Nelson,et al.  Agreement between photographic and clinical examinations in detecting developmental defects of enamel in infants. , 2013, Journal of public health dentistry.

[5]  P. D’Alpino,et al.  Prevalence of Enamel Defects in Permanent Teeth of Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate , 2013, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[6]  N. King,et al.  Caries Experience of Chinese Children with Cleft Lip and Palate , 2013, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[7]  G. Antonarakis,et al.  Caries Prevalence in Non-Syndromic Patients with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Caries Research.

[8]  G. V. van As Magnification alternatives: seeing is believing, part 2. , 2013, Dentistry today.

[9]  G. V. van As Magnification alternatives: seeing is believing, Part I. , 2013, Dentistry today.

[10]  D. Dawson,et al.  The effect of surface defects in early caries assessment using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and micro-digital-photography (MDP). , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  D. Manton,et al.  Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group. , 2012, International dental journal.

[12]  Adrian Lussi,et al.  The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation. , 2012, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[13]  P. Rechmann,et al.  Performance of laser fluorescence devices and visual examination for the detection of occlusal caries in permanent molars. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  G. Vougiouklakis,et al.  The Impact of Magnification on Occlusal Caries Diagnosis with Implementation of the ICDAS II Criteria , 2012, Caries Research.

[15]  Christos Rahiotis,et al.  Evaluation of a new fluorescence-based device in the detection of incipient occlusal caries lesions , 2012, Lasers in Medical Science.

[16]  M. Fontana,et al.  Changing paradigm: a different view of caries lesions. , 2011, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[17]  Adrian Lussi,et al.  Light-emitting diode and laser fluorescence-based devices in detecting occlusal caries. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  W. Seow,et al.  Comparison of enamel defects in the primary and permanent dentitions of children from a low-fluoride District in Australia. , 2011, Pediatric dentistry.

[19]  S. Palaskar,et al.  The Prevalence of the Developmental Defects of Enamel in a Group of 8-15 Years Old Indian Children with Developmental Disturbances , 2011 .

[20]  Mariana M Braga,et al.  Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. , 2010, Dental clinics of North America.

[21]  M. A. Rawashdeh,et al.  Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in a Population of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients , 2010, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[22]  S. Levy,et al.  Association between Enamel Hypoplasia and Dental Caries in Primary Second Molars: A Cohort Study , 2009, Caries Research.

[23]  M. Semiz,et al.  Reproducibility and agreement of clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries using unaided visual examination and operating microscope. , 2009, Journal.

[24]  M. Braga,et al.  Performance of a Pen-Type Laser Fluorescence Device and Conventional Methods in Detecting Approximal Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth – in vivo Study , 2009, Caries Research.

[25]  A. Lussi,et al.  Performance of Fluorescence Methods, Radiographic Examination and ICDAS II on Occlusal Surfaces in vitro , 2008, Caries Research.

[26]  M. Swain,et al.  Transmission electron microscope characterisation of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[27]  A. Fuks,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy of visual examination, bite-wing radiographs and DIAGNOdent® on the diagnosis of occlusal caries , 2007, European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.

[28]  B. Costa,et al.  Difference in the Prevalence of Enamel Alterations Affecting Central Incisors of Children with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate , 2005, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[29]  F. Mendes,et al.  Effect of alteration in organic material of the occlusal caries on DIAGNOdent readings. , 2004, Brazilian oral research.

[30]  G. V. van As Magnification and the alternatives for microdentistry. , 2001, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[31]  J. Norén,et al.  Enamel hypomineralization of permanent first molars: a morphological study and survey of possible aetiological factors. , 2008, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[32]  A review of the developmental defects of enamel index (DDE Index). Commission on Oral Health, Research & Epidemiology. Report of an FDI Working Group. , 1992, International dental journal.